Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ivor4781. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Not really no.
It's a consequence of the Government not following its own rules.
One might question the dedication of successive Home Secretaries in ridding us of criminal dregs, leaving the country open to this kind of judgement.

They must have heard the expression 'where there's a will there's a way'.
Why the hell can't the authorities get these things right? Because of their ineptitude we are now stuck with this no use to anyone persistent violent criminal. I despair sometimes.
"Dont It Make Your Blood Boil"

It certainly does.

Which is the posters question.
Yes it does. Meanwhile we have threads running that some still express how beneficial to us EU "membership" is. The EU prevented us from deporting him even after it was proved beyond doubt that he was a habitual violent criminal. I don't suppose he crossed Europe with their connivance, before being facilitated the opportunity to enter the UK illegally from France, then?
// But lawyers took his case to the European Court of Human Rights and the UK was ordered not to remove him from the country 'until further notice'.
There was no prospect of deporting him, but he was kept in immigration detention for three periods between 2012 and 2016.//
My blood doesn't boil, but I do wonder why they can't get it right - yet again.

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Dont It Make Your Blood Boil

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.