No Knickers?

[DavidUK]

Can I really believe my eyes? In this week's TV Times, there is a picture on page 23 of tennis player Ann-Lena Groenefeld and it definitely looks as though she has no knickers on! What's more - she looks clean shaven. This must be a trick of the light surely? Or is TV Times resorting to crotch shots to gain readership :-)

[Whickerman]

there'd better be a link to a picture somewhere...!

[DavidUK]

Sorry Whickerman - no link! I can only suggest that you shoot off (!) to your local newsagent and find a copy there.

[Jules001]

DavidUK, you must have been looking with a microscope ;) because I hadn't even noticed this picture, I just went to have a look after your posting, I personally think it is a trick of the light sorry to disappoint you guys :o)

[chazza]

Could she be wearing flesh coloured underwear?

[Jay_Jay]

P'raps she's going for the modern interpretation of that famous/infamous poster 'Tennis-girl showing her derriere'.

[SurreyGuy]

What page number please? :o)

[Pippa68]

I wonder how many people have rushed out to buy a copy..or stood at the shelf madly flicking over the pages to have a look?

[marwel7]

David,do you work for TVTimes?

[DavidUK]

No, marwel, I'm afraid I don't work for them. I hope there is an ABer who works there, though, and then we might get to the bottom (or front!) of this.

I wonder, Pippa, if there are newsagents puzzled why people are showing an unusual interest in the TV Times?

And Jules: how dare you accuse me of using a microscope! What kind of perv do you think I am? No, I used a magnifying glass.

[Pippa68]

Well David I did just try and buy one ~ went to the newsagents and they had all sold out!

Surely word hasn't spread that fast? lol.

[Jules001]

lol @ DavidUK - sorry please accept my apologies - of course a magnifying glass is far less pervy than a microscope ;)

[chazza]

I actually had a look last night - she is v obviously wearing underwear - you can clearly see the line at the bottom of the shorts she is wearing!

[Jay_Jay]

lol @ "v obviously"

(God! I hate this "lol" expression!)

[DavidUK]

chazza: she's wearing a skirt not shorts! And it's not at all v obvious to me.

Apology accepted, Jules. Of course, it may only be a matter of time before I progress on to the harder forms of magnification :-(

[DavidUK]

Perhaps it's like an inkblot - you just see what you want to see!

[chazza]

Yes i could see she was wearing a skirt, but she had shorts-type underwear underneath - very obviously