Justice!

[Quizmonster]

I have just returned from holiday, so I may well have missed something, but has no one else noticed that Julian Assange's latest appeal against extradition to Sweden to face sex charges has been dismissed by the Supreme Court?
I am delighted, though I daresay he will trouble judiciaries here and/or elsewhere for months to come, before it all ends. Certainly, in the UK, he has been told by a special magistrate, the Appeal Court and the Supreme Court that he has a case to answer there. The sooner the better.

[Quizmonster]

Beso, do you have a shred of ACTUAL evidence that the CIA did any such thing as "putting women into Assange's life as sleepers"? ('Sleepers' is a rather unfortunate term in the circumstances!) If so, I suggest you share it immediately with his Swedish defenders whom, incidentally, I understand he has failed to pay for their work to date on his behalf.
If you have no such evidence, I suggest your description of Jab more aptly fits YOU.

[ichkeria]

Can anyone give an example of "disgusting American behaviour" or "uncomfortable truths" exposed by Mr Assange relating to the US - apart from the obvious one that they're not very good at keeping their diplomatic papers confidential? Most of it relates to embarrassing stuff written by intelligence operatives and diplomats about other countries. The sort of stuff all countries have a right to produce for discussion and expect to have kept confidential. Otherwise such assessments could never be made and that would be a bad thing.

I personally think he should have no case to answer in the US, but like Quizmonster I am glad to see that he has lost his appeal. Based on the fact that I (not the courts!) don't like him. As I've said before I think Assange is simply a complete fraud