Film, Media & TV1 min ago
what a horrible woman.
why wasn't she given a longer sentence, I feel so strongly about this having lost my first son a full term still born, I think she may be in for a rough ride in prison and when she gets out.
http:// news.sk y.com/s ...ll-t erm-hom e-abort ion
Dave.
http://
Dave.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Nope, just as stabbing a full-term pregnant woman through the womb, killing her baby but not her, is not murder. A foetus at any stage is not classified as a person. Something to do with the law on abortion, but this aspect of it is sick ...
Hence she was charged with "administering a poison with intent to procure a miscarriage." If she was mentally ill then she would have had a defence. As it was, she had none ...
Hence she was charged with "administering a poison with intent to procure a miscarriage." If she was mentally ill then she would have had a defence. As it was, she had none ...
Her defence claimed that the bevy was stillborn. That means there's an element of doubt (regarding the status of murder).
However, the child 's body has not been recovered, so there is no way to use forensic tests to prove/disprove whether it was really stillborn (and who knows whether the drug she self-administered actually caused the still birth.
Very difficult to view this dispassionately. There are so many people longing to adopt, and this just seems like a wicked waste of a potential life.
However, the child 's body has not been recovered, so there is no way to use forensic tests to prove/disprove whether it was really stillborn (and who knows whether the drug she self-administered actually caused the still birth.
Very difficult to view this dispassionately. There are so many people longing to adopt, and this just seems like a wicked waste of a potential life.
-- answer removed --