ChatterBank1 min ago
Australia V England
18 Answers
How on Earth did we contrive to lose that one?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by paulllambert. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
This has obviously been a disastrous tour for England. But this match was very close, and shows that despite the battering we're moving in the right direction, no? Came down to the last over, England actually reached 300 in an innings of some form or other, but Faulkner played an unbelievable innings.
Once in my life I'd love to see a sports match involving an English side not to be reviewed with "we played badly" if we lose and "they weren't up to much" if we won. Isn't it possible for the opposition to, you know, be good?
Once in my life I'd love to see a sports match involving an English side not to be reviewed with "we played badly" if we lose and "they weren't up to much" if we won. Isn't it possible for the opposition to, you know, be good?
close... but the answer is probably that England started too slowly again, with Cook, Root and Ballance swallowing up nearly 10 overs - a fifth of their innings - scratching out 33 runs. When the game is going at a run a ball, that's basically five overs wasted.
You could say it's tough to demand that the side batting first should know what the "correct" scoring rate is. But England are usually too slow off the blocks, and it happened again today.
You could say it's tough to demand that the side batting first should know what the "correct" scoring rate is. But England are usually too slow off the blocks, and it happened again today.
-- answer removed --
jim, re the tour as a whole... Morgan and Buttler weren't on most of it. They're not scared of the Aussies, and are quite ready to go for it. Same goes for Bopara and Jordan.
But the ones who were in the Ashes (not counting those dropped, retired or succumbing to depression) are still shell-shocked - that means basically Cook and Root. I suppose they're being given the opportunity to play themselves back into form. But they aren't grasping it. They need a rest.
But the ones who were in the Ashes (not counting those dropped, retired or succumbing to depression) are still shell-shocked - that means basically Cook and Root. I suppose they're being given the opportunity to play themselves back into form. But they aren't grasping it. They need a rest.