Donate SIGN UP

Welby: We Need To Understand What Jihadists Are Talking About

Avatar Image
naomi24 | 07:20 Fri 30th Sep 2016 | Religion & Spirituality
92 Answers
//It is becoming “essential” to grasp the logic of people driven by an obsessive belief that the end of the world is nigh//

They're not.

//It’s very difficult to understand the things that impel people to some of the dreadful actions that we have seen over the last few years unless you have some sense of religious literacy.//

That’s true – and he doesn’t.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/27/welby-we-need-to-understand-what-jihadists-are-talking-about/
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 92rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
God save us from the holy men.
Question Author
Amen to that^.
It is easy to say they are crazy, evil.
But that doesn't really explain what makes them tick (no pun intended).
He is right that to come to a rational answer for the irrational acts of religious violence, we need to try and see it from their point of view. That does not mean taking their side or exonerating them from blame. But it does mean looking at why someone who apparently believes in god can do horrendous acts of violence on others, and do murderous suicide. Writing them off as loonies doesn't really get to the core of the problem, or trying to solve it.
Question Author
Gromit, //He is right that to come to a rational answer for the irrational acts of religious violence, we need to try and see it from their point of view.//

But he isn't seeing it from their point of view. Like many, he's seeing it from his own (erroneous) point of view.
// he's seeing it from his own (erroneous) point of view. //

Every point of view will be individual and different. Welby, as a religious man, is trying to understand it from that perspective. It doesn't necessarily mean it wrong. He might think your point of view is erroneous. At least he is trying to make sense of the senseless rather than dismissing it as just madness that madmen do.
At least he is trying to make sense of the senseless





Super Smashing ... let me know when he has accomplished that.
Question Author
Gromit. //Every point of view will be individual and different. Welby, as a religious man, is trying to understand it from that perspective.//

But he is not understanding it from a religious perspective. He just thinks he is. He talks about religious literacy. If he possessed that he would have a clearer understanding of the mindset he claims - but fails - to comprehend.
It is clear that you think you understand the mindset better than Welby. So share your wisdom.
Question Author
//So share your wisdom. //

Wisdom isn't necessary. Research is - and that's what he hasn't done.
Naomi,
Don't be coy. Share with us the conclusion of your research.
Question Author
Gromit, I wouldn't have the time to write it - and you wouldn't have the time to read it.
Talbot - //At least he is trying to make sense of the senseless





Super Smashing ... let me know when he has accomplished that. //

That approach is exactly what keeps us in the current state of terrorism and 'war on terror' to use President Bush's laughable an inaccurate (but great vote-catching!) phrase!

Muslim extremists are here, and they are not going away any time soon, so we have two choices.

We can treat them like some sort of alien species and try (and fail) to destroy them, which simply adds fuel to their argument that the West hates them, and produces an ever-decreasing vicious circle.

Or we can attempt to understand what motivates them, which can be positive step towards trying to get them to stop what they are doing.

Let's face it, stubbornly treating terrorists like monsters (which they are, but they don't think they are) simply re-enforces their notion that we are the evil party. So a level of understanding has to be worth a try - it can't make things any worse.
Driven by an obsessive desire that the end of the world is nigh?

How about driven by the obsessive desire to stamp out Christianity and any followers who will not convert and replace it with their own twisted and wicked culture.

Driven to occupy as much territory as possible and not cease until they have been wiped out.

We have just heard about the objection raised by a teaching assistant to show footage of 911. How would you teach what Welby advocates and how many teachers would be fully on board?

Naomi,
Right oh.

Perhaps instead you might explain how Welby is so erroneously wrong.
Question Author
andy-hughes, //Or we can attempt to understand what motivates them, which can be positive step towards trying to get them to stop what they are doing. //

You make no effort to understand what motivates them. Still, a little chat over nice cup of tea should do it.
Question Author
Gromit, //Perhaps instead you might explain how Welby is so erroneously wrong. //

Read agchristie's post at 09:01.
// We have just heard about the objection raised by a teaching assistant to show footage of 911. //

Her objection was not about showing footage, it was about 11 year olds being shown material that was restricted to over 18s presumably because the material was not suitable for children.
Question Author
Gromit, are you sure about that?
agchristie - //Driven by an obsessive desire that the end of the world is nigh?

How about driven by the obsessive desire to stamp out Christianity and any followers who will not convert and replace it with their own twisted and wicked culture.

Driven to occupy as much territory as possible and not cease until they have been wiped out. //

That simply restates the extremist position, but it doesn't help in terms of doing something about that may actually succeed, when the 'war on terror' (chortle!) continues to abjectly fail to do anything except make things worse.

// We have just heard about the objection raised by a teaching assistant to show footage of 911. How would you teach what Welby advocates and how many teachers would be fully on board? //

My understanding of the TA's objection is that graphic film of a terrorist atrocity is unsuitable for children of that age - a view with which I entirely concur.

That has of course been hijacked to be motivated by some sort of 'embarrassment' that the deaths were caused by Muslims, which is frankly farcical, and says more about those who wish to gain anti-Muslim support for their views.

We need to educate our war-mongering politicians before we educate children - they are the ones sending planes and soldiers.
While I was writing my post, Gromit has agreed with my view, and Naomi has reiterated hers - which does somewhat prove my point.

1 to 20 of 92rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Welby: We Need To Understand What Jihadists Are Talking About

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.