ChatterBank2 mins ago
Can you carify for me ED, whether you or your minions are monitoring AB
75 Answers
this evening and making sure no dickeds decide to be Snags and put links up to any of the banned pictures of Kate, i'm not opening ANY LINKS at the moment. I also would really like to see a ban for any ABer who tried to post the pictures.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dotty.. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.A road nearby? A telephoto lens? How mercenary can you get? It does not matter who you are, taking photos in this way is an invasion of privacy. Happy to let your nearest and dearest females be held up to public scrutiny without a top? The reactions by some male Abers have been puerile and salacious. No, don't bother attacking me for my reactions.
No different from what one sees on a French beach every day. But she was not on a French beach, is not French and has not done anything to justify the humiliation she may feel.
Private means what it says. Private.
The jokes posted were not funny and only showed how some people regard females as sexual objects, not human beings deserving respect.
No different from what one sees on a French beach every day. But she was not on a French beach, is not French and has not done anything to justify the humiliation she may feel.
Private means what it says. Private.
The jokes posted were not funny and only showed how some people regard females as sexual objects, not human beings deserving respect.
While I tend to agree that it's an invasion of privacy, it's naieve to think someone who has little money won't at some point take opportunist pictures which they can sell for a lifechanging amount of money. It's all very well for everyone to be 'outraged' but a lot of people would happily do that for the type of money those pics will change hands for and Prince William can't possibly begin to have the vaguest idea of what life is like for some people or that he wouldn't do the same in their situation. I wouldn't personally do it, but I don't think the photographers are on their way to hell, in fact I feel it's a bit of a storm in a teacup.
-- answer removed --
It was a gross invasion of privacy – and the gutter press are always going to get photographs by devious means – but the fact is the pictures are now in the public domain and whilst I really can’t understand why anyone with any sense would be remotely interested in seeing them, I certainly wouldn’t ban someone for posting them. So she sunbathed topless. So what!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.