ChatterBank5 mins ago
Ed, You Are Such A Coward
113 Answers
You know what I'm talking about!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Took them over 24 hours to decide to be upset Ed!
I'll bet the people who objected were also those who we all know are used to the cut and thrust of the News and Religion topics
These are not shrinking violets prone to going to bed with nightmares
But never let it be said I'm unwilling to compromise - I have changed it:
http:// en.grav atar.co m/useri mage/17 941552/ 97c2bcd dad2e9a 8bb72a0 b5d6ff4 614e.jp eg
(Compromise does not mean give in!)
I'll bet the people who objected were also those who we all know are used to the cut and thrust of the News and Religion topics
These are not shrinking violets prone to going to bed with nightmares
But never let it be said I'm unwilling to compromise - I have changed it:
http://
(Compromise does not mean give in!)
-- answer removed --
"Took them over 24 hours to decide to be upset Ed!"
We don't pick up emails in the evening and not everyone is on all the time. Are you really making an argument for this "technicality"?
"I'll bet the people who objected were also those who we all know are used to the cut and thrust of the News and Religion topics"
Or to put it another way:
"YEAH! I bet it's those people I don't like! Stands to reason dunnit?"
It's odd that you've gone down this route as you often take apart this kind of argument in debate sections of the site!
We don't share this kind of information, as you know. Rest assured however that you wouldn't be able to name a single one of them!
We don't pick up emails in the evening and not everyone is on all the time. Are you really making an argument for this "technicality"?
"I'll bet the people who objected were also those who we all know are used to the cut and thrust of the News and Religion topics"
Or to put it another way:
"YEAH! I bet it's those people I don't like! Stands to reason dunnit?"
It's odd that you've gone down this route as you often take apart this kind of argument in debate sections of the site!
We don't share this kind of information, as you know. Rest assured however that you wouldn't be able to name a single one of them!
Jake, see my post here at 16:34 Tue 17th Dec 2013.
It's not a matter of being a shrinking violet - I'm far from that - and I don’t have nightmares. I do, however, recognise poor taste when I see it - and the choice of an avatar portraying a disgusting serial paedophile, particularly when it's used solely in an effort to discredit a politician, which it was, is height of poor taste. There are far more intelligent ways to attempt to demonise Mrs Thatcher or anyone else without compromising decent ethical standards or valuable self-respect - but you, it seems, have managed to do both.
It's not a matter of being a shrinking violet - I'm far from that - and I don’t have nightmares. I do, however, recognise poor taste when I see it - and the choice of an avatar portraying a disgusting serial paedophile, particularly when it's used solely in an effort to discredit a politician, which it was, is height of poor taste. There are far more intelligent ways to attempt to demonise Mrs Thatcher or anyone else without compromising decent ethical standards or valuable self-respect - but you, it seems, have managed to do both.
Ab Editor, meanwhile may we have so much as a hint why the thread about some people saying that shopkeepers faced 40 lashes for supplying alcohol was pulled? The thread consisted of reasoned debate, much of it on the interpretation of the law, and none of it apparently racist (not that you couldn't pull any racist reply and leave the thread intact). And the story itself was not subject to any legal restrictions, there being no charges or injunctions.
I suspect what upset people wasn't Savile and Maggie (quite a reasonable juxtapostiion, especially since it really happened) - it was just Savile himself. His picture just makes people want to puke. Me too. I can remember what he did without having his face around all the time.
I didn't object or report it, though.
I didn't object or report it, though.
perhaps this nice chummy photo would do as well
https:/ /fbcdn- sphotos -g-a.ak amaihd. net/hph otos-ak -prn1/5 8549_55 3549524 685519_ 1445403 530_n.j pg
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.