Returning Users

sunny-dave | 20:52 Mon 16th Jul 2018 | Editor's Blog

90 Answers

There are (at least) three or four currently active users who claim to be "new", but are actually nothing of the sort.

I have no particular objection to this and the previous (I think) AB_ED said that (with a few particularly egregious exceptions) he/she had no objections to returnees slinking back, as long as they behaved themselves and stayed away from contentious subject matter - perhaps posting just in Q&P or Crosswords or similar areas.

The problem at the moment is that (after a period of being Mr/Ms Niceperson), the current batch of Lazarus figures are starting to pick fights and generally return to the habits which made them persona non grata, whilst being quite careful to do nothing quite bad enough to get them 'removed' again.

This is (patently) unfair and far from a level playing field. I've seen some long term posters get some quite nasty/subtle abuse over the last few days - from people whose previous history is not available, thus making any attempt to 'give as good as you get' virtually impossible.

I'd like to suggest that all users have to (initially at least) register from a non-mobile device - thus allowing their ID to be verified against the list (which I'm sure must exist) of MAC addresses known to be used by previously banned users then (if the Ed allows them back) their new username can be linked to the old one.

Yes, I know MAC addresses can be faked - but that's probably beyond most of the people that I'm referring to. It might even catch-out a few of the Spammers too.

What Has Happened To Answerbank?

Ed: Any Chance Of Making Room For More Subscribed Threads To Be Displayed?

Answers

61 to 80 of 90

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Mamyalynne

It was illuminating how many leapt on the bandwagon from day one, clever these trolls eh?

-- answer removed --

Mamyalynne

Why mention them then?

-- answer removed --

nailit

//the illuminati have nothing to do with this //
David icke would disagree Spath ;-)

hazydaisy

I am not new but have had on going problems with my laptop and phone after a bout of illness
Hence rejoining with a new but recognisable name
Missed you all

Mamyalynne

Hello again Daisy x

-- answer removed --

Rosetta

JTH, if a previous user is not banned or suspended and is free to rejoin whenever whenever she chooses, is it also ok for us to speculate on her new user name. And when does a troll become a troll

jno

if they're not banned or suspended they can reuse their original name. If they've rendered themselves inactive I dont think that's an option, but there's no objection to them returning. Often enough, like hazydaisy, they'll announce it themselves. But if they're not making mischief, I don't know that it's anyone's business.

I hadn't realised Islay wasn't around. I hope she's okay?