Quizzes & Puzzles18 mins ago
Ford - Banned spitfire ad
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by tysonpj. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Spitfires and Hurricanes used Rolls-Royce Merlin engines. Churchill considered the Merlin engine such an indispensable part of Britain�s air defences that, in 1940, he secretly ordered a set of blueprints to be sent to the US in case the UK was overrun by Nazi Germany. There, it was developed and built under licence by Packard in Detroit. Henry Ford turned down the opportunity because he was convinced that Britain would lose the war anyway.
"Between 1939 and 1945, Ford of Great Britain produced 38000 Rolls Royce Merlin Engines for the Royal Air Force. It is probability because of this in 1990 we don't have to say Vorsprung durch Technik"
Vorsprung durch Technik of course being the catchphrase of adverts by the German Car Firm Audi.
Anyway, Ford Motor Company in the UK had their Aero Division in Trafford, Manchester in WW2 and produced in excess of 20,000 Merlin engines for the war effort between 1941 and 1945. Obviously, Rolls Royce were running flat out, as were many other factories. It's said that Rolls Royce broke down all the Ford engines and then re-assembled them just to prove they were up to standard, but that's probably apocryphal - they didn't have the time. The Ford Merlins went into Lancasters and Mosquitoes as well as Spitfires.
As has been said before - "Maybe that's why we don't have to say 'Vorsprung Durch Technik"!
There is anti-American sentiment in some of the responses at the start of this post, and by implication, support for the Advertising Standards Authority's banning of the advert because of its anti-German tone, but every statement in that advert was accurate. Like it or not, if it was not for Churchill, and the Americans, and indeed those engines, we might very well be speaking German today, which was precisely the point the advertisement was making. The ASA, whose questionable values allow offensive advertising to be shown this very day, should be ashamed of its ruling which removed an intensely moving work from our screens.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.