He didn't suggest banning the public, he suggested managing the New Forest to allow it to recover. Its all in your own link woofgang and I can't see how this can be so misinterpreted.
http://www.telegraph....st-could-be-lost.html
I also read his comments about the panda. He did admit to being a bit flippant, but did say that we can no longer afford the campaign to save the panda. The amount of money spent already and the amount of money we are likely to spend on this unsuccessful mission could be used to much better effect elsewhere now. Again, I don't see why he can't say that without being attacked from all fronts! He's not about supporting things just because they're cute or popular, he's a realist that's all.