Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 19 of 19rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by vetuste_ennemi. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Remarkable. I'm looking forward to an explanation of fossilised jelly.

This could break the mould!
I’ll get some nails.
Question Author
Exciting because of the preservation of soft tissue, Douglas.

Coincidentally, only last night I was watching a program I recorded ages ago on the similarly exceptional Cambrian fossils found in the Burgess Shales.
Brilliant finds.
"Exciting because of the preservation of soft tissue, Douglas."

Exactly my point, I just need help in understanding the process whenit's usually bones and feathers that are preserved.
It bears reading up on but initially it appears both the speed of the rising mud that covered then and the make up of that mud may have contributed.

Fascinating.
// only last night I was watching a program I recorded ages ago on the similarly exceptional Cambrian fossils found in the Burgess Shales.//

yeah that was pretty remarkable - it comes around every few years
Question Author
//yeah that was pretty remarkable - it comes around every few year//

I'm not bright enough to understand the insult, Peter. You'll have to explain it to me, otherwise your point in making it will be lost.
Question Author
...and thank you for your contribution to my thread.
I presumed Peter meant they reshow the programme every so often.
There was a program about the Burgess shales - it involved going out to the back of beyond where it was very cold and climbing up a cliff face to see the original site worked in 1909

a year or so later - there was a program about the Burgess shales - it involved going out to t where it was very cold and climbing up a cliff face to see the original site that walcott worked in 1909

then some years later
here was a third program about the Burgess shales - it involved going out to Canada .....

and I realised that the program was the same one
it has just come around every few years

no insult

some try hard ( bust a gut ) to find insult where there is none
but hey this is AB in full swing on Sunday night

oo and thanks for the link to another program about the Burgess shale - you know Stephen J Gould wrote a book about it?
Thank you mama - admirably and succinctly put

I mean the sentiment was pretty obvious innit - that is if you are a committed Burgess Shale programme watcher ( which of course I am)
Never miss one.
The book by Gould is worth a read

he was famous in his life time and pretty sure he was right the whole time - but apparently his successors and chewing their pencils and stating they arent quite sure
I'll bear it mind, ta.
This sort of reminds me being quite entranced with finding trilobites in pieces of shale when I was a kid.
the wiki article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossils_of_the_Burgess_Shale

is remarkably good considering - - - it is wiki
It is a fair article and some good links onward too , thanks.

Night Peter.
518 million years old. So beautiful. Wow.

1 to 19 of 19rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Cambrian Fossil Find...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.