The K M Links Game - November 2024 Week...
Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by tartanwiz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As a species we use very slight variations in face shape to identify individuals -- we can each distinguish many thousands of different people, and recognise many hundreds.
Because of that we are very sensitive indeed to subtly different face shapes. The relatively large differences between "races" overwhelm those subtleties, and we perceive that they are very different. In fact, the differences are quite small -- we are one species with slight local variations.
An illustration of this is given by two men I knew who worked in the same office. They were very different in size, character and face shape, but were constantly getting confused. The problem was that they were both balding, wore glasses, had beards and rather pink complexions. Those crude signals overwhelmed the usual subtle facial cues.
Spot on, Camille, but eastern and southern Africa are more likely. That's where all the earliest ape-people have been found.
Other species of human did arise elsewhere -- Neanderthals, for example, were mainly European, (though their ancestors, which were also ours, were of course African too). Likewise the much earlier Homo erectus may have been just Asian, again developing from African ancestors. Homo florensis too, now, the tiny people recently discovered on Flores -- they seem to been a very recent survival of a Homo erectus type.
The "Out of Africa" theory is now widely accepted by scientists. It holds that all modern humans have colonised from Africa, and later diverged into the modern "races".
There is another group of scientists who say that earlier local types scattered over the Old World evolved separately and simultaneously into modern humans. In my view this makes no biological or evolutionary sense.
However, it is not perhaps impossible that earlier types did interbreed to some extent with the Africans as they colonised. This could mean that modern people in some parts of Asia have a small part of their descent from earlier species in that area.
On the other hand genetic analysis of modern Europeans and Neanderthals suggests that no Neanderthal genes survive in the modern population (despite appearances in some persons of my acquaintance). This would not be the same thing as the Asian idea though, as Neanderthals were a parallel species to us, not an earlier, more primitive one.
However you look at it, all modern humans are incredibly closely related, and we have all come from much more "primitive" humans quite recently.
No I dont think we do look different.If some of us had two heads then i think you may have a point.
HomoFlorensis is a different species, it is in Nature of a week or so ago. Dony buy it (�10) but it is worth a trip to a library to see the article.
Florrie sure looks different! 3' 6" squat
eyes too close together\-a bit like Geo Bush
No no this is meant to be serious.