Donate SIGN UP

Possibility

Avatar Image
whiskeryron | 15:02 Sat 24th Mar 2012 | Site Suggestions
14 Answers
Hi Ed
In view of this coming to light ( http://www.guardian.c.../naked-rambler-prison)

Would it be at all possible to launch a protest to be signed by as many A/Bers as possible to be presented to the Prime Minister asking for the release of this unfortunate man who is incarcerated on a point of principal ?

W Ron.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by whiskeryron. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
All I'm getting with your link is, 'Internernet explorer cannot display the webpage'
same
Question Author
I wondered what you were on about Ron, when I read your post earlier today but couldn't be bothered to open the link. I have just read the Guardian's article on the other thread and have to say I completely agree with you.

I don't know what the answer is as he needs to wear something until the rest of us have caught up with him and we can all `return to the garden'.
If the law says you may not go around in your birthday suit in public, you go to prison for breaking the law. If you feel the principle is so important, you could lobby for a change in the law, but you may not just defy it.
I personally would be much offended to be confronted by a naked man in any public circumstances, and I am quite sure so many other people would be affronted that the law will not be changed. He will just have to lump it.
There are plenty of laws I don't like, but I don't break them "on principle" ( not "principal", by the way )
Sounds like a weirdo to me, lock him up.
This man should not be in prison; he should be in a mental hospital.
Perhaps I am a wimp.....I sometimes get embarrassed by the naked truth.!!

Ron...(the other one.)
Yeah go on Ed, let's cause a bit of harmless trouble- like a riot but you don't have to leave your office chair;-)
Will pass thanks, guy's a nutter.
The 'offence' is not being naked, the 'offence' is causing alarm/distress, etc to persons *by* your nakedness.

The Courts are saying that he would alarm, etc. etc. the public.......without any of the public actually making a complaint of *being* alarmed.

Indeed, on his many journeys, it appears that *no-one* has complained that they have been offended by his appearance.
can't say he'd bother me, and he doesn't appear to have bothered anyone very much. This sounds like a victimless crime to me. Still, the police have to have something to do, I suppose.
"to be presented to the Prime Minister"


I don't have that kind of money!

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Possibility

Answer Question >>