Sunday Express Skeleton 24Th November...
Crosswords1 min ago
Suspension from AB
45 Answers
Dear Ed
Last week my account with AB was suspended with no prior explanation. I have today received your e-mail as below:
"Thanks for the email and sorry for the delay in getting back to you, your account has now been unsuspended.
As none of the content on any of your postings has been explicit, offensive, abusive etc the reason behind the suspension is most likely to be due to excessive posting i.e. you have posted more than 3 times in 5 minutes. This
rule has always been in place and is not by any means a new feature.
Hope this explains the problems"
Would you please consider the following:-
1) If this is a rule of Answerbank, surely it should be listed accordingly with other site rules.
2) Whilst I can understand your wish to eradicate spam, there is often good reason to provide answers quickly on Q&P site when jointly solving certain puzzles, so can the ruling not be applied more selectively?
And may I also ask if the 3 postings in 5 minutes applies to Q&A in different threads, or only Q&A within the same thread, or both?
Since my suspension I have looked carefully at other postings, and there seems to be absolutely no uniformity with the implementation of this rule.
Regards (sarumite)☺
Last week my account with AB was suspended with no prior explanation. I have today received your e-mail as below:
"Thanks for the email and sorry for the delay in getting back to you, your account has now been unsuspended.
As none of the content on any of your postings has been explicit, offensive, abusive etc the reason behind the suspension is most likely to be due to excessive posting i.e. you have posted more than 3 times in 5 minutes. This
rule has always been in place and is not by any means a new feature.
Hope this explains the problems"
Would you please consider the following:-
1) If this is a rule of Answerbank, surely it should be listed accordingly with other site rules.
2) Whilst I can understand your wish to eradicate spam, there is often good reason to provide answers quickly on Q&P site when jointly solving certain puzzles, so can the ruling not be applied more selectively?
And may I also ask if the 3 postings in 5 minutes applies to Q&A in different threads, or only Q&A within the same thread, or both?
Since my suspension I have looked carefully at other postings, and there seems to be absolutely no uniformity with the implementation of this rule.
Regards (sarumite)☺
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sarumite. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'm still waiting to find out what my other name is !!
Presumably lector is trawling through all my posts to find it ...well he may be some time ...as he obviously can't back up his accusation .
As for his line against chatting
"But not chat of the dedicated personal nature amongst a small band ....... go onto a personal chat-site .... chatterbank / Answer Back / et al ....
..... and definitely not clandestine chat in old AB threads....
They are hardly clandestine .....they are right out in the open for everyone to read including Lector who probably knows all about my recent washing machine disaster and the fact that my dog has a sore ear ....because he reads them !
If that's not proof positive of his vendetta then I don't know what is . He just loathes people being friendly .The Editor knows all about the chat threads ..they don't interfere with him so I cannot see why he has to get himself so steamed up about them .
If the Editor didn't allow a little leeway she would zap them,but she doesn't ....probably because we contribute much more to AB than just nattering in a corner.
As I have said before ...I would like to see Lector give someone some help on here in respect of other categories and do the" wider participation "thing he is always banging on about .
He should take a leaf out of his own book ...chill out ..have a natter with people ..but he's too much of a miserable old curmudgeon to do so.Just wants to lay down his rules all the time ...and as has been said, takes the moral high ground when things are not run to his petty standards .
Presumably lector is trawling through all my posts to find it ...well he may be some time ...as he obviously can't back up his accusation .
As for his line against chatting
"But not chat of the dedicated personal nature amongst a small band ....... go onto a personal chat-site .... chatterbank / Answer Back / et al ....
..... and definitely not clandestine chat in old AB threads....
They are hardly clandestine .....they are right out in the open for everyone to read including Lector who probably knows all about my recent washing machine disaster and the fact that my dog has a sore ear ....because he reads them !
If that's not proof positive of his vendetta then I don't know what is . He just loathes people being friendly .The Editor knows all about the chat threads ..they don't interfere with him so I cannot see why he has to get himself so steamed up about them .
If the Editor didn't allow a little leeway she would zap them,but she doesn't ....probably because we contribute much more to AB than just nattering in a corner.
As I have said before ...I would like to see Lector give someone some help on here in respect of other categories and do the" wider participation "thing he is always banging on about .
He should take a leaf out of his own book ...chill out ..have a natter with people ..but he's too much of a miserable old curmudgeon to do so.Just wants to lay down his rules all the time ...and as has been said, takes the moral high ground when things are not run to his petty standards .
Lector (and Shaneystar2)
You state Lector in your post to shaneystar2
quote: '(and Ont-ice in one of his threads indicates another one of your names!) unquote.
I don't know that I ever suggested that anyone - including yourself - had multiple names.
If I can't prove it I don't state it.
So please inform me of when I pointed out that shaneystar2 had another user name.
Thank you.
You state Lector in your post to shaneystar2
quote: '(and Ont-ice in one of his threads indicates another one of your names!) unquote.
I don't know that I ever suggested that anyone - including yourself - had multiple names.
If I can't prove it I don't state it.
So please inform me of when I pointed out that shaneystar2 had another user name.
Thank you.
dragging in the friendlies now .... loads of accusations about half-a-dozen names or more that I am alledged to have had in the past .... yet it is blackandtan that puts the sword to your 'innocence .... what happens if everyone has technical (ho ho) reasons for another name or two .... ?
saraumite
you set off a reasonable post here ... although a little repetitive ... but then shaneystar2 launched off into a psychotic tirade .... best to stay doing what you are best at .... answering many questions ... but a little slower!
shaneystar2
challenges accusations psychosis .... I have no wish to get involved with the likes of you on any basis. As regards this site, my email is known to one ABer and the Ed.
As a long term member of AB you have often demonstrated your belief that this gives you some pre-emption rights, over how AB should be run ... �I chat� ... well, the news is that having been one of the chief aggravators (with your insistence to chat) that made the life of the last Ed difficult (just go back and see some of the aggro you caused thisLady) ... having been one of the main early-day moaners against KM during her first few xwords (that recent survey run by Aquagility must have annoyed you) ... you are not in charge, any longer, even from the shadows .... so, leave it to the new Ed to run this show; who certainly seems to have regained the initiative and taken-back control of this site ....
maybe chatterbank / Answer Back / Messenger are sites that you should master in --- much better for verBOSSitY -
the floor is open to you to thunder again .... �frankly my dear, I don't give a damn� .....
..... I shall not return to this thread .... there is much in here already that sheds new light on your problems .... and I do not wish to be associated any further with such rank poison.
saraumite
you set off a reasonable post here ... although a little repetitive ... but then shaneystar2 launched off into a psychotic tirade .... best to stay doing what you are best at .... answering many questions ... but a little slower!
shaneystar2
challenges accusations psychosis .... I have no wish to get involved with the likes of you on any basis. As regards this site, my email is known to one ABer and the Ed.
As a long term member of AB you have often demonstrated your belief that this gives you some pre-emption rights, over how AB should be run ... �I chat� ... well, the news is that having been one of the chief aggravators (with your insistence to chat) that made the life of the last Ed difficult (just go back and see some of the aggro you caused thisLady) ... having been one of the main early-day moaners against KM during her first few xwords (that recent survey run by Aquagility must have annoyed you) ... you are not in charge, any longer, even from the shadows .... so, leave it to the new Ed to run this show; who certainly seems to have regained the initiative and taken-back control of this site ....
maybe chatterbank / Answer Back / Messenger are sites that you should master in --- much better for verBOSSitY -
the floor is open to you to thunder again .... �frankly my dear, I don't give a damn� .....
..... I shall not return to this thread .... there is much in here already that sheds new light on your problems .... and I do not wish to be associated any further with such rank poison.
I will defend my corner yet again from this muppet who seems to now have absolutely lost the plot .
1.The previous Editor was quite happy for people to chat and the new Editor seems happy about it too.
2. I have never moaned about the standard of the DT crossword .In fact I have often said she (KM) is doing a grand job . May have said I found them a bit easy but nothing detrimental to her capabilities.If you can find any post from me saying otherwise do cut and paste it here where we can all see it .
4 I am still waiting for you to tell me what my other name is ...so is Ont-ice.
5.I am not "in charge" of anything or anyone ....you are the one with the rule book .
And finally ....get your head tested.....you talk out of the back of your neck .Check your ears too...I can see the steam coming out of them .
Most of the psychotic tirade is from you with this bee you have in your over inflated bonnet about people chatting.
I shan't be returning to this thread either (huge sigh of relief from sarumite ) to bandy words with a cowardly peasant like you .
Bye bye Hector !
1.The previous Editor was quite happy for people to chat and the new Editor seems happy about it too.
2. I have never moaned about the standard of the DT crossword .In fact I have often said she (KM) is doing a grand job . May have said I found them a bit easy but nothing detrimental to her capabilities.If you can find any post from me saying otherwise do cut and paste it here where we can all see it .
4 I am still waiting for you to tell me what my other name is ...so is Ont-ice.
5.I am not "in charge" of anything or anyone ....you are the one with the rule book .
And finally ....get your head tested.....you talk out of the back of your neck .Check your ears too...I can see the steam coming out of them .
Most of the psychotic tirade is from you with this bee you have in your over inflated bonnet about people chatting.
I shan't be returning to this thread either (huge sigh of relief from sarumite ) to bandy words with a cowardly peasant like you .
Bye bye Hector !
