ChatterBank4 mins ago
Okay then Ed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 Answers
Please can i have an explanation???? No doubt others on here will tell me just to drop it and just deal with it etc. But can you answer me the following................
A while ago you stated that that the new format of the sports part of answerbank was NOT going to change back to its original format. Fair enough, a lot of us did try and make you change your mind, but not only did the people who wanted it changed back (that was THE MAJORITY by the way!) to the old format, not get their wish. But also an explanation was NEVER given as to why it the format was "here to stay"!.
Now i haven't been on here for a while, but the latest Blog has forced me make this entry.
I see that you are bringing back chatterbank (was this by popular demand???) for a week only and if more people say Yes then No, then it will be here to stay.
All i ask is why will you listen to the majority in this case but NOT listen to the majority in the case of the Sports answerbank who did not want it changed.
Introducing Chatterbank is a good thing in my view by the way, as it'll make B and S less clogged up
It is at the stage now where i'm not that bothered whether it changes back now anyway, but an explanation would be nice. I doubt i'll get one as i never have. But anyway, i've said my piece.
Hello to everyone by the way!!
A while ago you stated that that the new format of the sports part of answerbank was NOT going to change back to its original format. Fair enough, a lot of us did try and make you change your mind, but not only did the people who wanted it changed back (that was THE MAJORITY by the way!) to the old format, not get their wish. But also an explanation was NEVER given as to why it the format was "here to stay"!.
Now i haven't been on here for a while, but the latest Blog has forced me make this entry.
I see that you are bringing back chatterbank (was this by popular demand???) for a week only and if more people say Yes then No, then it will be here to stay.
All i ask is why will you listen to the majority in this case but NOT listen to the majority in the case of the Sports answerbank who did not want it changed.
Introducing Chatterbank is a good thing in my view by the way, as it'll make B and S less clogged up
It is at the stage now where i'm not that bothered whether it changes back now anyway, but an explanation would be nice. I doubt i'll get one as i never have. But anyway, i've said my piece.
Hello to everyone by the way!!
Answers
1 to 4 of 4
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by toonmilo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
We all know toonmilo that if you did that (start to talk about sport) in the chatterbank section (which I believe will be in the format of the SAB section) then it would be swiftly shifted to SAB sports pub chat faster than you can type 'How did the Footb.......
However if it remains in normal AB format then 'chatterbank' is open to chatter. Then surely they can't discriminate against sports fans? As chatter covers all spoken words (or Typed) then the techies would have a job sorting it ALL out. sending subjects to appropriate........sub section catargories for everyone that went in there: IE if health was mentioned.... 'Wrong section lads lets send it to health etc....." it would have to be enforced.....right!
Not a chance.......CG discriminate no....
I think a lot of the older users of the sport section deserve an explanation as to why they were not given a vote.....
BTW.... good first half second, as expected pleased rooney kind of broke his duck
However if it remains in normal AB format then 'chatterbank' is open to chatter. Then surely they can't discriminate against sports fans? As chatter covers all spoken words (or Typed) then the techies would have a job sorting it ALL out. sending subjects to appropriate........sub section catargories for everyone that went in there: IE if health was mentioned.... 'Wrong section lads lets send it to health etc....." it would have to be enforced.....right!
Not a chance.......CG discriminate no....
I think a lot of the older users of the sport section deserve an explanation as to why they were not given a vote.....
BTW.... good first half second, as expected pleased rooney kind of broke his duck
1 to 4 of 4
