Afeared to post

[dot.hawkes]

I have never ever ever felt intimidated into not putting a thread on here expressing my true opinion, i have never ever failed to speak my mind in prose on here!!!!! I have got upset at several users over the years, and they with me, but I have always felt that there was a good relationshp with the editorial staff on here. Please can we ba assured that this will be maintained and we will not find ourselves pilloried and ridiculed for being rather repeptitive and opinionated?

[legendis.god]

Milking it dot.

Youve emailed.

Give the editor a chance for god sake get off the guys back and wait untilmtomorrow when hes back and has a chance to reply eh ?

[dot.hawkes]

are you trying to imply that my annoyance is ingenuine?

Notice that you can type in proper rows when you want too, not as difficult as you seem to find it is it?

[legendis.god]

Dot please read my reply.
There is the thread in question that youve posted on about this , then newsdesks thread and now another.

In my opinion , for what its worth , the more you post about it like this the more you dilute the the discussion .

D T H?

[B00]

Perhaps this is another reason why the Ed post was unwise.

It's caused more upset on the site.

[ventpeg]

I do not underatnd why you have this 'feeling' .... though clearly you are 'upset' and felt it necessary to post -

�Please can we ba assured that this will be maintained and we will not find ourselves pilloried and ridiculed for being rather repeptitive and opinionated?�

Please explain?

[legendis.god]

Essy question Boo.
Do you know that the editor hasnt already told , or even warned TCL via email previously , not to continue this as it would not be changed?


The answer to that question can make these threads either valid , or look very silly.

To hang the editor without him having the option to reply is contemptable.

[dot.hawkes]

you are quite right B00, yet it was 3.5 hours between the ed's post to TCL and my exclamation of surprise at the tone, had noone else found the reply inappropriate as i did? Or has everyone only just signed in like I have/

[dot.hawkes]

ventpig:
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/AB-Suggestions/ Question647960.html

also, i have just noticed that the question before TCL's is askiing the exact same question as him!!!! Has cazzzz been similarly castidated? I havn't read her thread yet

[Gormless]

legend is really rather chunder-making, but is what AB (the CB bit anyway) will be left with when all the interesting folk have given up.

[legendis.god]

Please can we ba assured that this will be maintained and we will not find ourselves pilloried and ridiculed for being rather repeptitive and opinionated?


good point

So no more pilotying folk fopr being repetitive eh ?


good advice , if its acted on : 0)

[dot.hawkes]

what?

[Gormless]

Yes, in English would have helped

[B00]

I've already responded about that one Legend.

As previously stated, I don't think it matters whether they've communicated on this topic before, privately or otherwise. Ed's response is totally unprofessional.

If they had communicated with each other before, and Ed's finally reached the end of his tether regarding this matter as your comments seem to indicate that this may be the case- wouldn't it have been better for Ed to have said something along the lines of "refer to my previous replies" or similar.

whilst your stalwart sticking up for the Ed will no doubt be remembered and will endear you to our new "chummy" leader he has to appreciate that given his position of authority on here, he's going to come under flak for any slips in unprofessionalism, especially when the slip is as as condescending towards a user as this one was.

[B00]

Was at work all day today dotty, logged on and was busily sticking up for TLC on another thread over in CB Land, didnt notice this one till it appeared in recent replies over there >>

:-)

[dot.hawkes]

It is called debate leg, just because there is no name calling, abuse nor references to army personel does not mean it is not worthwhile

[Gormless]

It is just possible that ED may regard legend as a Crawler. Unlikely but I live in hope.

[legendis.god]

Whiffy if thats supposed to impress intellectually then im afraid its found wanting.

Dot i assume waiting until tomorrow is out of the question?
Perhaps a posse could be rounded up and they could head to the editors house with rope to hand to sort him out at a good old fashioned lynching eh ?

[cazzz1975]

yikes, Im waiting for the axe to fall on my thread :O

[legendis.god]

Sory dot you lost the high ground when ypouresorted to saying arse licking.Hardly mature is it?
And boo id say the same for you, mrs, as you did in the raggy roman post about me posting there is aa paedophile ring on answerbank.

Its not about being chummy , as you did post in reply to raggy yesterday.

I think people like whiffy trying to get a bit of revenge for his names being banned by popping on here all indignant really is hilariously hypocritical.