A Spy's Favourite Way To Give Presents...
Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
AB Poll
23 Answers
Despite being unwelcome as THECORBYLOON, I am receiving e-mails as if THECORBYLOON were a member of the AB community still and the latest one has a poll
"It has been claimed maternity services in England lack the quality of care required for new mothers and babies. Do you agree?"
One of the options is "Couldn't comment, I have never used UK maternity services"
It seems the writer of the question is confused since England is part of the UK and not THE UK. May I suggest the AB Editor get off Twitter, gen up on the UK and correct the question and/or the option asap.
Many thanks
TCL
"It has been claimed maternity services in England lack the quality of care required for new mothers and babies. Do you agree?"
One of the options is "Couldn't comment, I have never used UK maternity services"
It seems the writer of the question is confused since England is part of the UK and not THE UK. May I suggest the AB Editor get off Twitter, gen up on the UK and correct the question and/or the option asap.
Many thanks
TCL
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TCL-MUMPING. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sorry TCL went to bed so missed your question, I personally think that the ed has set me up by ignoring my emails asking or help and support with the bullies and the abusive people like knobby and no-knowledge and legend, I believe the ed was just ignoring me and failing to do anything about them because I showed dissent at his ability to do his job. Then when I finally get pushed too far by knobby's abuse and vile comments. I retaliate in kind, pooofff, a reason for the ed to ban my id. He's banned that lot enough times, i guess I am just shocked that the ed chose to ban me rather than deal with the problem over the last few months. 25,000 posts gone, all because he could not address the issue and let them carry on, I am convinced that there has been a concerted effort to get me banned by their constant bating and goading. Some people are now supporting them because I dared to make comments about knobby's wife, well where was their support for me over the last few months when there was constant vile abuse going on? So much for it all being pixels eh? The ed has allowed this to happen and I assume he prefers the abuse on here rather than tackle it when it is reported.
well it would seem dots now had a pardon .
ive read shes had all her posts reinstated and her username.
surely now as a precedent has been set in reinstating her name then the corbyloon must also have all his useful answers ive read about reinstated.
ive said previously that he shouldnt have , as obviously there are rules for everyone.
but if dot has had hers reinstated i can see folk like the corbyloon having the same right.
perhaps theres been a policy or mood change within the editorial team.
i for one will be first to back tcl in his bid for equal treatment .
legend
ive read shes had all her posts reinstated and her username.
surely now as a precedent has been set in reinstating her name then the corbyloon must also have all his useful answers ive read about reinstated.
ive said previously that he shouldnt have , as obviously there are rules for everyone.
but if dot has had hers reinstated i can see folk like the corbyloon having the same right.
perhaps theres been a policy or mood change within the editorial team.
i for one will be first to back tcl in his bid for equal treatment .
legend
Hi lexie, i do agree with the sentiment that Corbyloon should be reinstated, I am not 100% sure why i have come back, I have narrowed it down to the following, which may help Corbyloon in his on going campaign:
1) The ed made a mistake and was only intending deleting certain posts of mine but pressed the wrong button and it took a day to sort it out technologically.
2) The ed did not make a mistake but he thought it would be a good way to show me that he has the power and the technology and he knows how to use it.
3) The ed got sick of my deluge of irate angry and down right indignant emails and decided it just was not worth the hassle and reinstated me.
4) The spare ed came into work on Saturday and saw what the ed had done and read my continued barrage of emails and decided that I should be reinstated and has done that, in which case when the ed gets into work Monday and see what the sub ed has done he could throw a hissy fit and delete me again.
I know it also means that corbyloon should be able to be technically reinstated, as all the years of my postings had been removed, i think TCL should contact the ed again and suggest there is a lifting of his ban.
1) The ed made a mistake and was only intending deleting certain posts of mine but pressed the wrong button and it took a day to sort it out technologically.
2) The ed did not make a mistake but he thought it would be a good way to show me that he has the power and the technology and he knows how to use it.
3) The ed got sick of my deluge of irate angry and down right indignant emails and decided it just was not worth the hassle and reinstated me.
4) The spare ed came into work on Saturday and saw what the ed had done and read my continued barrage of emails and decided that I should be reinstated and has done that, in which case when the ed gets into work Monday and see what the sub ed has done he could throw a hissy fit and delete me again.
I know it also means that corbyloon should be able to be technically reinstated, as all the years of my postings had been removed, i think TCL should contact the ed again and suggest there is a lifting of his ban.
If I remember correctly, legliar told TCL to shut his mouth and stop moaning. That was when he was doing his snivelling creep act to impress the Ed. Once again this scumbag has shown his many faces.
Good to see Dot Hawkes back and hopefully TCL as well. Another two excellent contributors should also be reinstated, Abdulmajid (his colour shouldn't matter) and Lucy Thomas, both sorely missed for their intellectual input. I'm sure the Ed will now reconsider his policy.
Good to see Dot Hawkes back and hopefully TCL as well. Another two excellent contributors should also be reinstated, Abdulmajid (his colour shouldn't matter) and Lucy Thomas, both sorely missed for their intellectual input. I'm sure the Ed will now reconsider his policy.
" surely now as a precedent has been set in reinstating her name then the corbyloon must also have all his useful answers ive read about reinstated.
ive said previously that he shouldnt have , as obviously there are rules for everyone. "
POsted earlier.
Always better if one reads the whole thread.
Bring back the corbyloon i say.
and did at 10.31 am this morning
silly sewerdk you arent very clever or youd have realised .
lol
lol
lol
btw
?�?� DID I LOL ?�?
ive said previously that he shouldnt have , as obviously there are rules for everyone. "
POsted earlier.
Always better if one reads the whole thread.
Bring back the corbyloon i say.
and did at 10.31 am this morning
silly sewerdk you arent very clever or youd have realised .
lol
lol
lol
btw
?�?� DID I LOL ?�?
I have just found an email from the spare ed regarding my banning on friday, the first part is a polite but stern telling off for being quite angry in my emails to the ed, but this is an interesting response as to why i was banned, and possibly could be why Corbyloon has gine too:
I was confused to why you were banned when I logged on Friday evening. I
> am only a Spare Ed after all. The conclusion we have come to is that we do
> not know why you were banned. No-one seems to have done it manually. The
> system may have, it seems, �cocked up.�
>
> The machinery which runs AB towers is old and held together with rust. I
> have tried to Un-ban you but I cannot be sure if it has worked. I wondered
> if you could try logging in?
>
> All the best,
>
> - The Spare Ed.
I was confused to why you were banned when I logged on Friday evening. I
> am only a Spare Ed after all. The conclusion we have come to is that we do
> not know why you were banned. No-one seems to have done it manually. The
> system may have, it seems, �cocked up.�
>
> The machinery which runs AB towers is old and held together with rust. I
> have tried to Un-ban you but I cannot be sure if it has worked. I wondered
> if you could try logging in?
>
> All the best,
>
> - The Spare Ed.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
