Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Which is the correct sentence?
31 Answers
Which sentence is correct: the one with one period of the other with two?
1. The sentence is "We must study hard to attain good results.".
2. The sentence is "We must study hard to attain good results."
Thanks.
1. The sentence is "We must study hard to attain good results.".
2. The sentence is "We must study hard to attain good results."
Thanks.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tanelaine. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Period? I'm guessing that you're American because we Brits call them 'full stops';-)
You're first example is definitely wrong. You only need one full stop(/period).
I usually use a single full stop OUTSIDE the quotation marks (since that completes the quotation and then ends the sentence), but I fully accept that the text book way of doing it is as per your second example.
Chris
You're first example is definitely wrong. You only need one full stop(/period).
I usually use a single full stop OUTSIDE the quotation marks (since that completes the quotation and then ends the sentence), but I fully accept that the text book way of doing it is as per your second example.
Chris
So was I, Horseshoes!
As I wrote above, it makes sense to end the quotation (which is within the sentence) and then to end the sentence itself. However the convention used within the print media (and, perhaps more importantly, by the grammar-checking functions of word processing programs) is that the full stop goes inside the quotation marks.
As I wrote above, it makes sense to end the quotation (which is within the sentence) and then to end the sentence itself. However the convention used within the print media (and, perhaps more importantly, by the grammar-checking functions of word processing programs) is that the full stop goes inside the quotation marks.
Dickens (and I) must have gone to a different school from Chris and horseshoes.
Here's the first book I've taken from my shelf: The Alteration by Kingsley Amis (a fiend for correct English; he wrote a book about it):
Pastor Williams said in his gentle but resonant voice, 'The original was lost, as is explained by the temporary replacement you have, which was produced by our embassy here in London, and is valid.'
I'd put the full stop after the speech marks IF the words inside the speech marks did not amount to a full sentence -
He said the riots were 'a disgrace'.
But if they're a full sentence:
He said: 'The riots are a disgrace.'
Here's the first book I've taken from my shelf: The Alteration by Kingsley Amis (a fiend for correct English; he wrote a book about it):
Pastor Williams said in his gentle but resonant voice, 'The original was lost, as is explained by the temporary replacement you have, which was produced by our embassy here in London, and is valid.'
I'd put the full stop after the speech marks IF the words inside the speech marks did not amount to a full sentence -
He said the riots were 'a disgrace'.
But if they're a full sentence:
He said: 'The riots are a disgrace.'
We have to remember that the Americans do this sort of thing differently from us. British usage is that the full stop, question mark or exclamation mark comes INSIDE the quotation marks only if it BELONGS to the quotation; otherwise, it goes OUTSIDE them to indicate the end of the sentence as a whole.
The Yanks are happy with the following structure. Imagine a speaker asking a question about an incident...
When did President Kennedy say, "Ich bin ein Berliner?"
Note that his words were NOT a question, but they put the question mark with the words. We, on the other hand, would write...
When did President Kennedy say, "Ich bin ein Berliner"?
The mark outside recognises the fact that it is the whole sentence which is a question, not the quote.
Under no circumstances are there two full stops - or other combination - as in Sentence 1 above. Sentence 2 is OK, but I too would put a comma after 'is', as I have done after 'say' in my examples above.
The Yanks are happy with the following structure. Imagine a speaker asking a question about an incident...
When did President Kennedy say, "Ich bin ein Berliner?"
Note that his words were NOT a question, but they put the question mark with the words. We, on the other hand, would write...
When did President Kennedy say, "Ich bin ein Berliner"?
The mark outside recognises the fact that it is the whole sentence which is a question, not the quote.
Under no circumstances are there two full stops - or other combination - as in Sentence 1 above. Sentence 2 is OK, but I too would put a comma after 'is', as I have done after 'say' in my examples above.