News1 min ago
James Bulger Murder Film.
64 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I wouldn't make a judgement on the film without seeing it. Nor would I try to stop the person from making a film. I also would not attempt to censor the film after it's been made. We live in a society where we can write, paint, make films.
From the filmmaker...quoted in The Washington Post
// “While it is a painfully difficult case to understand, I believe we have a responsibility to try and make sense of what happened,” Lambe said. He added: “There has been criticism that the film ‘humanises’ the killers, but if we cannot accept that they are human beings, we will never begin to understand what could have driven them to commit such a horrific crime.” //
From the filmmaker...quoted in The Washington Post
// “While it is a painfully difficult case to understand, I believe we have a responsibility to try and make sense of what happened,” Lambe said. He added: “There has been criticism that the film ‘humanises’ the killers, but if we cannot accept that they are human beings, we will never begin to understand what could have driven them to commit such a horrific crime.” //
I signed because of my own personal feelings, when this awful crime was committed I did not read or watch anything about what happened to James. I could not as I felt you cannot unsee or unhear what was done to this poor boy. As a mother I felt his mother would never be able to shut her eyes again without imaging what was done to her child and retain her sanity. Maybe that's me not facing up to reality , but I have a choice and I don't want that in my head and as to why anyone would willingly sit and listen to that horror I cannot understand but that is their choice.
In Cold Blood was a very good film. Heavenly Creatures was a brilliant one. Both were about murder cases involving young people. (The killers in Heavenly Creatures are still alive; one writes detective novels.)
It would have been nonsense for either film to have been banned just because people remembered the cases. People do not own tragedies just because someone from their family was involved.
It would have been nonsense for either film to have been banned just because people remembered the cases. People do not own tragedies just because someone from their family was involved.
I haven't signed, either. Not because i am heartless but because i have a choice whether to sign or not. I also have a choice whether to watch this film or not and, of course, i will not. I had the utmost sympathy for Denise Bulger when this crime occurred but, over the years, it seems to me that she is expecting to be notified of every aspect, every moment of the two killers' lives - which disturbs me a little and makes me believe that she thrives on being in the public eye. Just my opinion, of course. As i very much doubt she will ever watch this film, i don't see how she will have to relive the horror of what took place.
I'm unsure it should be banned, but I'm not without sympathy for those that do. I read that Director Vincent Lambe said he wanted to "humanise" the killers. We know they're human, else they'd not have been arrested. It smacks of attempts to create sympathy for the guilty, and whilst the victim's family are around to be aware of it. And as such is close to disrespecting the victim. Not a good thing to have done.
Cloverjo, as Pastafreak says, the memory will remain stark for the rest of her natural. However, as i said, i do think that she sometimes appears to go out of her way to keep the memory of what happened current in the public eye. I may well be doing her a disservice, but as i said earlier, it is just the impression i have formed over the ensuing years.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.