Is this art or are they 'Installations'?
Installation is just about the most pretentious word to pass off any old tat as 'art' there has to be.
Art, of course, is subjective, but for me the 'art' in the Turner Prize is just self-indulgent rubbish. No doubt this makes me a luddite.
Take Martin Creed - I mean really, how are we meant to take this seriously...
"Creed’s art is characterised by a gentle but subversive wit and by a minimalism rooted in an instinctive anti-materialism. His often extremely self-effacing works, all titled by number, such as Work No.79 1993, ‘some Blu-Tack kneaded, rolled into a ball and depressed against a wall’, or Work No. 88 ‘a sheet of A4 paper crumpled into a ball’,"
A sheet of A4 paper crumpled into ball is 'art'? In which case, I manage to produce art most days of the week!
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/exhibition/turner-prize-2001/turner-prize-2001-artists-martin-creed
As for the quote in Shoota's post.....well, they're idiots, aren't they.