ChatterBank1 min ago
Grammatical Gripes
20 Answers
I was always taught that you never put a comma in front of 'and' as it is a joining word, or begin a sentence with and, but or so, yet this practice has been on the increase for some years now. I do have other grammatical gripes but would be interested to hear other people's nominations.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by alisa. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hope you don't mind me saying so, but yours is rather a petty gripe. As regards the comma before "and", I wouldn't use it in a simple list of one-word things, but would certainly where the "and" starts a whole new clause - eg "I went to Brighton to see Uncle Bert, and then to Hove to see Aunt Lil." On the old chestnut of not starting a sentence with "And" or "But", I would recommend you look through almost any book by Dickens. It won't be long before you find not only sentences, but paragraphs, and occasionally whole chapters, beginning with one or other of these conjunctions. And [sorry!] if it was good enough for him, it ought to be good enough for us.
My gripes:
"Me" in the subject, as in "You and me are going to eat dinner now.
Incorrect use of apostrophe - "The bird got out of it's cage" or "I did'nt know."
Using the wrong verb form after a complicated subject, like "The Church of All Saints are having a rummage sale today" (instead of "is" - are the saints having the rummage sale, or the church?).
I can't think of others right now, but I'm sure I will as soon as I click the button.
I agree completely with Sylday. There are many situations in which 'comma/and' is a perfectly acceptable structure. Re opening sentences with conjunctions, not only Dickens but the finest writers of English for centuries have been doing precisely that. Have a look at the King James' Bible, Chaucer and Shakespeare, for example. I'm afraid your teachers quite misunderstood English usage. Churchill famously refused to countenance this sort of nonsense. On being told he should never end a sentence by using a preposition, he replied: "This is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put."
It's possible to create a gramatically correct and intelligible sentence using the word "and" 5 times consecutively:
The Landlord of the Pig and Whistle pub had the sign repainted but he complained to the signwriter that it wasn't how he wanted it.
What's wrong with it?", said the signwriter?
"There's too much space between the pig and and and and and Whistle", said the landlord.
as I understand it, the rule about not putting a comma before "and" is only a simplified version which is taught to young children, to prevent them using it excessivelY. similarly, the rule about not starting a sentence with "and" is to prevent the insertion of a full-stop between clauses which should be in the same sentence, but which children might list as separate sentenceS. it is only later that one learns the greater subtleties of language usage, and can then do it correctly in the right contexT.
by the way, i agree with all the points of pedantry listed abovE. especially the one about the apostrophE.
by the way, i agree with all the points of pedantry listed abovE. especially the one about the apostrophE.
While there may be some points made in the replies I still think that commas are too often used unnecessarily in sentences with 'and', especially in very short sentences. Also I have read Dickens, Shakespeare and Chaucer, but language has changed much since then, especially Chaucer's day! I fully accept that language has to change and adapt, though please let us not take on too many Americanisms, such ugly use of the English language.
I said that I have other gripes, petty as some of you may think, but that is what is good about sites like this.
Words such as 'none', meaning no-one, is often used in conjuction with a plural such as 'are'or 'have' when it is singular and should be 'is' or 'has'. Also the use of words like 'quicker' when the person really means 'more quickly'.
Sorry folks but petty it may be but I may as well get annoyed by small things as well as bigger things too!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.