Motoring2 mins ago
Some years ago the tobacco companies tried to re-introduce chewing tobacco.
7 Answers
Their campaign failed, not least because a report stated that using it could cause mouth cancers. Was it the nicotine, or something else in the tobacco, which was carcinogenic?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sandy....I am not sure that the scientists know the carcinogenic substance in tobacco and nicotine has not been shown to be the agent.
Other chemicals called nitrosamines are likely culprits but here again research is still ongoing.
So in answer to your question.....I don't know.
Lazygun would be your best bet.
Other chemicals called nitrosamines are likely culprits but here again research is still ongoing.
So in answer to your question.....I don't know.
Lazygun would be your best bet.
Dragging up facts gleaned in my student days.....betel nut chewing certainly was associated with oral cancer and was particularly a habit with construction workers, fishermen and drivers......particularly if not totally in the Far East.
I have no idea what chemicals betel nuts contain, but lazygun will surely know.
I have no idea what chemicals betel nuts contain, but lazygun will surely know.
I recall the failed attempt to introduce Skoal Bandit products during the latter half of the 1980s.
Many reports have been produced on the effects of smokeless tobaccos.
http:// www.gua rdian.c ...9/sm oking.j amiedow ard
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipping_tobacco
Many reports have been produced on the effects of smokeless tobaccos.
http://
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipping_tobacco
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.