Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Nhs
23 Answers
If anyone misses an NHS appointment without informing the Hospital without a good reason should they be charged the £150 that it costs for a "No Show"?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TWR. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The basic concept is a good one. My doctor's surgery puts up a sign showing how many appointments are missed each month - and it's not one or two. I am at the doctor's surgery most weeks and would never not attend an appointment.
Alas I think that the admin costs of running such a scheme might be too high to make the scheme wothwhile.
Alas I think that the admin costs of running such a scheme might be too high to make the scheme wothwhile.
The average cost of a missed outpatient appointment to the NHS is closer to £40 (calculated by dividing the estimated total cost per year, of £225m, by the 5.6m appointments which were missed).
However the losses for some types of appointment will be far greater than for others. Telling people that they'll cost the NHS money if they fail to attend has been shown to reduce the rate of missed appointments (from 11.1% to 8.4% in the Barts trial):
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/publi cations /reduci ng-miss ed-hosp ital-ap pointme nts-usi ng-text -messag es/a-ze ro-cost -way-to -reduce -missed -hospit al-appo intment s
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/publi cations /reduci ng-miss ed-hosp ital-ap pointme nts-usi ng-text -messag es/a-ze ro-cost -way-to -reduce -missed -hospit al-appo intment s
Even so, actually charging people for missed appointments might not as effective as some might suggest. For example, someone on a very low income might initially fail to pay. Court action to get them to pay (even if the court costs are added to their debt) might be counter-productive if they're ordered to pay at, say, just £2 per week. The administrative costs of collecting such payments might end up being greater than the debt which was being recovered.
However the losses for some types of appointment will be far greater than for others. Telling people that they'll cost the NHS money if they fail to attend has been shown to reduce the rate of missed appointments (from 11.1% to 8.4% in the Barts trial):
https:/
https:/
Even so, actually charging people for missed appointments might not as effective as some might suggest. For example, someone on a very low income might initially fail to pay. Court action to get them to pay (even if the court costs are added to their debt) might be counter-productive if they're ordered to pay at, say, just £2 per week. The administrative costs of collecting such payments might end up being greater than the debt which was being recovered.
The trouble is that missing an appointment isn't black or white. Just suppose, for example, that you have an accident on the way to the appointment; I think most people would agree that a charge wouldn't be appropriate. Now it's your partner that has the accident; do you leave them and go to the appointment or do you stay with them? (notifying the hospital wouldn't be at the forefront of your mind). You can then come up with more reasons (less important) for missing the appointment; where do you draw the line. OK, you can have an appeals system, like you do for parking fines, but then it starts getting clumsy and expensive to administer.