ChatterBank1 min ago
Glow Behind Eyes
8 Answers
So ... out with dogs tonight with a torch:... got me thinking....
When a person (or animal) dies wld their eyes still “glow” when a torch beam shone in them? Wld a dead person / animal still get that “red eye” effect when a photo is taken with a flash?
If not.... then what causes the “glow” in a living creatures eyes?
When a person (or animal) dies wld their eyes still “glow” when a torch beam shone in them? Wld a dead person / animal still get that “red eye” effect when a photo is taken with a flash?
If not.... then what causes the “glow” in a living creatures eyes?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by eve1974. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.its a reflection of the back of the eye https:/ /www.go odeyes. com/blo g/red-e yes-pho tos/
and why they glow green https:/ /text.n pr.org/ 9641436 4
There's a very funny short story by James Thurber called the 'Topaz Cufflinks Mystery' first published in the New Yorker which this reminds me of, does anyone know it? https:/ /www.ne wyorker .com/ma gazine/ 1932/07 /23/the -topaz- cufflin ks-myst ery
have any of the biologists said tapetum?
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Tapet um_luci dum
dim light - the retinal cells get a second go
which make them even sensitiver ( as alice wd say)
When I was doing Phys with sir colin blakemore ( sir later that is - much later) 3 photons was sufficient to fire a retinal cell.
which is just a little too many for 'is there a photon there?' if the cell doesnt fire. - quantum effects in retinal phys.
( light intensity so low that 'did that photon fire the cell?' competes with 'light intensity so low that was there a photon there?
we had really good visual physiology lectures at cambridge
https:/
dim light - the retinal cells get a second go
which make them even sensitiver ( as alice wd say)
When I was doing Phys with sir colin blakemore ( sir later that is - much later) 3 photons was sufficient to fire a retinal cell.
which is just a little too many for 'is there a photon there?' if the cell doesnt fire. - quantum effects in retinal phys.
( light intensity so low that 'did that photon fire the cell?' competes with 'light intensity so low that was there a photon there?
we had really good visual physiology lectures at cambridge
thanks for the question eve
the wiki article is like my old zoo-otobly lectures
you have a sign - red eye and this is how a variety of animals solve it - now what conclusions can we draw from the info ?
evo devo has sortta changed a lot since they found a retinal mamalian protein in an insect eye
completely unexpected
the wiki article is like my old zoo-otobly lectures
you have a sign - red eye and this is how a variety of animals solve it - now what conclusions can we draw from the info ?
evo devo has sortta changed a lot since they found a retinal mamalian protein in an insect eye
completely unexpected
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.