Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Why???
I have just had a huge row with what I thought was a friend. Basically he has booked a trip on an African safari whereby he will be hunting elephants, lions and other beautiful creatures. Obviously, it will not be on protected reserves and the company state they will only kill elderly animals or "the alpha male" so the herd/pack etc will thrive to populate. Also they are stating that hunting is good for the environment as it ironically assists the eco-system.
Now, as you may know I am an animal lover but I do hunt. However, I vehemently maintain that I have never killed anything I or a colleague would not eat. I have shot a few dears, and to be honest i was a little upset as they too are majestic animals. However, it was on land where they are bred for meat, and I am not a vegetarian. Likewise, venison is lovely and I am a crack shot so the animals did not suffer.
I will state, I am anti-snare traps and baiting. And fox-hunters can rot in hell as far as I am concerned.
So my long-winded point is, how can I convince my "friend" that this �7000 safari hunt is morally wrong. Also how can anybody enjoy shooting a giraffe or a lion for mere pleasure?
I shall not post a link but if you put in safari hunt in google images you will see beautiful animals slain being exhibited after.
let the animals roam free and wild.
Convince me otherwise.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ###w-m###. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Firstly, the economy of Africa should not be propped up by hunting safaris. This is, in my opinion, the same as saying the economy of Thailand is propped up by the sex industry (which it is). Morality should overstep economics.
Secondly, as we both have stated, they target the older animals. How is this justification? Surely, it is these animals that the natural predator (i.e big cats etc) would hunt in the first place for their own eco-survival?
Thirdly, I have painfully examined the google images and I have to admit the vast majority are fat Americans.
Also, can you answer my question. Where is the pleasure in killing a giraffe? A human will a gun can anything. It is not sport is it? A leopard will run 60mph a bullet travels at 2100 mph, who will win?
And what's the difference between a fat American with a grin on their faces, and your 'slightly upset' demeanour after you've killed a 'majestic animal'? You've both killed an animal for your own satisfaction. There's no difference, really, between you and your friend. You justify your killing, and he morally reconciles his - old animals, cycle of nature etc. You're the same!
Also, I know you have read my posts, I have stated it is my opinion that meat is healthy. That is a separate debate really.
All I will say is can you name a sportsperson who is a vegetarian? I can't.
For lucky (sorry forgot to post)
Not pretty. Beware.
1) Don't question typos in an adult debate, Africa (A) is capitalised (see how silly it looks.
2) Have you actually read my posts? Where have I said, I shoot for pleasure or sport? I shoot to eat and that is it. Is it really that hard to comprehend? I take no pleasure in the kill and have even admitted shooting deer upset me.
3) What drug are you going on about. I really do not understand.
Or maybe xollob from a tacky bedsit, value chicken breasts from the supermarket, those that are killed by electrocution in huge waterbaths.
If you can not have a debate without resorting to petty insult for no reason whatsoever, I think I know who is the more intelligent being.
I gather you are probably scotch scum of the farming community who suffer with low pay
That is not your fault.
And what is your fourth thing??
I come on AB for a sensible dabate and am insulted by a peasant. And a scotch peasant at that.
The sign when one indicated an "L" on their forehaed springs to mind.
Filthy scotch scum.