Morning all, just a question. If someone's birthday is the first day of a star sign, can they be more like the previous sign or are they definitely that sign the first day comes under? Sensible answers please and if you don't believe in horoscopes, im sure there are plenty of other questions to answer! Thanks x
Im not really into horoscopes at all but I believe its called being born on the cusp, you can do a natal horoscope chart to see where the sun was on the day you were born. Either way you could just read both signs and see which one relates best to you. So basicly you arent both it depends where the sun was.
Really I never read mine but it doesnt sound like it, does it?
ok , found a link to a proper chart which will tell you where the sun was exactly. I was the later siode of the cusp so hjave a few things in Taurus, but also in libra and saggitarius too.
t would be interesting to find out how many people were actually a different starsign to what they though they were. Its where the sun rising part is thats relevant.
A person born in Leo foe example does not mean he's a Leo and a person born in Sagittarius can be a Leo. How well it's easy! The sign that somebody belongs in is NOT their Sun sign but, actually their ascendant sign that they were born in. This is their 1st house in their birth chart.
http://www.tryourluck.com/horoscope-matching-by-dob.html