Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Abortion Poll on AB
61 Answers
It is interesting that 33% have stated they would lower the limit to 12 weeks. I wonder how many who said this have had any direct experience of abortion.
Most pregnancies that are aborted before 12 weeks are due to unplanned and unwanted pregnancies. Going further down the line up to 24 weeks, it is often the result of discovering a severe abnormality in the foetus.
So basically, those 33% who voted that option are saying it is ok to abort an unplanned pregnancy because the baby is unwanted, but it's not ok for a couple, who have probably planned and much wanted the baby, to make a heartbreaking decision to have an abortion.
My opinion is that the abortion limit should stay at 24 weeks and a woman should be able make her own choice.
Most pregnancies that are aborted before 12 weeks are due to unplanned and unwanted pregnancies. Going further down the line up to 24 weeks, it is often the result of discovering a severe abnormality in the foetus.
So basically, those 33% who voted that option are saying it is ok to abort an unplanned pregnancy because the baby is unwanted, but it's not ok for a couple, who have probably planned and much wanted the baby, to make a heartbreaking decision to have an abortion.
My opinion is that the abortion limit should stay at 24 weeks and a woman should be able make her own choice.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by angel-cake. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
A man and a woman have a relationship that fails, they break up and later the lady finds out she is pregnant (as a result of failed contraception).
A short while after the man involved becomes permanently sterile (and unfortunately did not have the ability to have any sperm frozen prior to this unfortunate event).
The man has a supportive family and happens to be rich, he has always wanted children.
The woman is 23 weeks pregnant and wishes an abortion (given the above statements some of you believe that there is no need to justify a reason for a TOP so hypothetically we'll assume that the woman simply never wants children but would otherwise not be inconvencienced by carrying the baby to full term)
The lady is fit and well and there are no anomalies with the baby.
Does nobody believe that this is a rather unfortunate
A short while after the man involved becomes permanently sterile (and unfortunately did not have the ability to have any sperm frozen prior to this unfortunate event).
The man has a supportive family and happens to be rich, he has always wanted children.
The woman is 23 weeks pregnant and wishes an abortion (given the above statements some of you believe that there is no need to justify a reason for a TOP so hypothetically we'll assume that the woman simply never wants children but would otherwise not be inconvencienced by carrying the baby to full term)
The lady is fit and well and there are no anomalies with the baby.
Does nobody believe that this is a rather unfortunate
...set of circumstances
- the woman has not been raped
- her mental status would hypothetically not be affected by giving birth
- her work/career and family circumstances would not be adversley affected
- her health would not be detrimented in any way
- the baby has no abnormality
- the baby will be cared for
- the woman has not been raped
- her mental status would hypothetically not be affected by giving birth
- her work/career and family circumstances would not be adversley affected
- her health would not be detrimented in any way
- the baby has no abnormality
- the baby will be cared for
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
If a woman makes a decision to have an abortion she is making the decision for the baby as well. I think that is depriving the helpless of their rights.
There appears to be a second thing impled in this discussion - the rights of the strong (the mother) are greater than those of the weak (the child ).
Although this next thought appears a bit flippant, no doctor I know would deliberately make sure someone dies becase they are inconvenient or not very clever. Unfortunately that is how I see abortion , so think 24 weeks should not be an option.
There appears to be a second thing impled in this discussion - the rights of the strong (the mother) are greater than those of the weak (the child ).
Although this next thought appears a bit flippant, no doctor I know would deliberately make sure someone dies becase they are inconvenient or not very clever. Unfortunately that is how I see abortion , so think 24 weeks should not be an option.
I'd like to make it clear that I believe everyone is entitled to their views regardless of whether others agree or not.
There is another question for you to consider, the unborn child has no rights,
So:
Should a woman who fully intends to go to full term with the baby and is very happy about being pregnant be legally allowed to smoke and drink excess alcohol?
I ask purely out of interest because I believe such a law is unlikley to ever be passed as it would infer that the unborn child has rights and that would really cloud the water.
There is another question for you to consider, the unborn child has no rights,
So:
Should a woman who fully intends to go to full term with the baby and is very happy about being pregnant be legally allowed to smoke and drink excess alcohol?
I ask purely out of interest because I believe such a law is unlikley to ever be passed as it would infer that the unborn child has rights and that would really cloud the water.
I do not possess a crystal ball, but I'm fairly certain that TOPs will be carried out for a very long time (there are many reasons why this would be the case) however I'd be willing to bet large sums of money that in the not too distant future the 'abortion limit' will be reduced from 24 weeks.
Only time will tell.
Only time will tell.