News0 min ago
A study in human relationships.
60 Answers
Patient A Performed a sex act on him, whilst he examined her.
Patient B�He unzipped my trousers and started to examine the lump, but moved his hands further down
I started to laugh and we ended up on the couch�doing things to each other.
Patient C Have you come for sex or treatment asked the Dr. A bit of both she replied.
And would you believe it, it is the DR. that is being criticized and investigated.
Patient B�He unzipped my trousers and started to examine the lump, but moved his hands further down
I started to laugh and we ended up on the couch�doing things to each other.
Patient C Have you come for sex or treatment asked the Dr. A bit of both she replied.
And would you believe it, it is the DR. that is being criticized and investigated.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Sqad. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes sqad I would believe it.
It is a hair's breadth from feeling support from someone to imagining emotional / sexual attraction for them - ask anyone who has been an emotional counsellor for any length of time.
Just because patients make innapropriate advances does not entitle the doctor to take advantage of someone who is in a vulnerable state. If guilty, this man is a sexual predator, and should be struck off.
It is a hair's breadth from feeling support from someone to imagining emotional / sexual attraction for them - ask anyone who has been an emotional counsellor for any length of time.
Just because patients make innapropriate advances does not entitle the doctor to take advantage of someone who is in a vulnerable state. If guilty, this man is a sexual predator, and should be struck off.
Right
salla/lofty.....happily married or otherwise, if you found yourself in a situation whereby your "better halves" could never find out, both parties agreed that it would be a one off and both parties fancied each other.............then I put my month's pay that you would both go ahead........?????
salla/lofty.....happily married or otherwise, if you found yourself in a situation whereby your "better halves" could never find out, both parties agreed that it would be a one off and both parties fancied each other.............then I put my month's pay that you would both go ahead........?????
Not really.
This is about a doctors relationship with their patient and levels of appropriateness and as such does nto encompass the full range of human relationships out there to be compared to and the subjective dynamics.
By definition the doctor/patient relationship exists within defined parameters and so acting out of that warrents investigation and/or censor either officially or personally by the doctor, (eg: why a particular case of patient has made you more emtionally/physically responsive than others). It's not really comparable to human relationships that are not defined within similar restrictions... Does that make sense?
For what it's worth this doctor should be criticised and investigated for making a mockery and tarnishing the reputation (because that's what all these bad stories do) of other medical professionals, he should never have allowed any of this to continue regardless of the temptations, he was very silly and wreckless.
There are doctors out there who are forced to do very intimate examinations by definition of their specialty and manage a) generally not have investigations of gross misconduct levelled at them and b) have a lot to do to prove they are not guilty of gross misconduct when a vulnerable patient makes a claim because technically what they've done could be construed as a sexual advance in other circumstances. It's a very fine line sometimes and it has to be carefully moderated.
F e ckless doctors like the one described in this post indulging in the alleged kind of behaviour described in your post put themselves in this position by their own stupidity and as such don't get any sympathy from me.
This is about a doctors relationship with their patient and levels of appropriateness and as such does nto encompass the full range of human relationships out there to be compared to and the subjective dynamics.
By definition the doctor/patient relationship exists within defined parameters and so acting out of that warrents investigation and/or censor either officially or personally by the doctor, (eg: why a particular case of patient has made you more emtionally/physically responsive than others). It's not really comparable to human relationships that are not defined within similar restrictions... Does that make sense?
For what it's worth this doctor should be criticised and investigated for making a mockery and tarnishing the reputation (because that's what all these bad stories do) of other medical professionals, he should never have allowed any of this to continue regardless of the temptations, he was very silly and wreckless.
There are doctors out there who are forced to do very intimate examinations by definition of their specialty and manage a) generally not have investigations of gross misconduct levelled at them and b) have a lot to do to prove they are not guilty of gross misconduct when a vulnerable patient makes a claim because technically what they've done could be construed as a sexual advance in other circumstances. It's a very fine line sometimes and it has to be carefully moderated.
F e ckless doctors like the one described in this post indulging in the alleged kind of behaviour described in your post put themselves in this position by their own stupidity and as such don't get any sympathy from me.
Why do we do it sqad?
Because we want to.
Because the opportunity is there.
Because it's exciting.
Because it has an element of danger - therefore exciting.
Because we all like to be desired.
Because most of us have desires.
But - wanting it, does not mean we should have it, or make it right. Or wrong.
Like you said - human behaviour. Complex, confusing, contrary, incomprehensible at times. That's what stops life from being boring.
Because we want to.
Because the opportunity is there.
Because it's exciting.
Because it has an element of danger - therefore exciting.
Because we all like to be desired.
Because most of us have desires.
But - wanting it, does not mean we should have it, or make it right. Or wrong.
Like you said - human behaviour. Complex, confusing, contrary, incomprehensible at times. That's what stops life from being boring.
You asked me if I would...Mmm not sure to be honest. I would definitely absolutely be tempted. But agreeing to it being a one-off? There's almost always someone who ends up wanting more...
If the other half never found out? Mmm... but I'd know.
I fancy a lot of people, but apart from one occasion I've never gone for a 'one-off' or a one-night stand, no matter how great the guy - not my scene.
But would I? Maybe :-)
If the other half never found out? Mmm... but I'd know.
I fancy a lot of people, but apart from one occasion I've never gone for a 'one-off' or a one-night stand, no matter how great the guy - not my scene.
But would I? Maybe :-)
salla...whilst doing a GP locum to earn some dosh, it was not uncommon for a patient to ask for a home visit and when i arrived, it was obvious from what she was wearing and her attitude, what the home visit was for.
Surely you must have incklings of that in your practice.
Also it is very difficult when someone called for a home visit to organise a chaperone in order to examine her and one just went ahead and hoped for the best.......I mean went on to examine her and hoped for the best that she wouldn't cry rape.
Surely you must have incklings of that in your practice.
Also it is very difficult when someone called for a home visit to organise a chaperone in order to examine her and one just went ahead and hoped for the best.......I mean went on to examine her and hoped for the best that she wouldn't cry rape.
