//‘higher bills’, ‘chronic radiation’, ‘privacy loss’, ‘home insecurity’, ‘remote disconnects’, ‘hackers’, ‘behavioural modeling & analysis’, ‘profit’ or ‘institutional shareholders’.
A nice piece of selective use of data, Togo. Advertisers do it all the time.
'higher bills'. Maybe, but in line with electricity supply generating costs. Regulators role is to analyse and control this, but then you probably don't believe that either. Are you perhaps one of those who believe that solar panels and wind-power are the best thing since sliced-bread? They may be, but the electricity they generate sure costs more per unit, because of the capital cost of the installation.
'chronic radiation' - oh yeah? - have you got wi-fi in your house, or stuff a mobile phone in your ear every day. Far higher radiation output levels in fry your brain from these.
I could go on. You are clearly not a fan of these, but incapable or unwilling of presenting a balanced picture.
Sticking to basics (the main thrust of my first reply), it is good for UK plc if a method can be found of reducing demand at times of high usage. To do so, reduces the need to invest in as much generating capacity as would otherwise be required (determined through that good old phrase above 'behavioural modelling' - aka - when people take a shower or switch the kettle on). Industry has long since been managed in this way, and now technological advances (aka smart meters) enables the same principles to be extended to millions of other users - domestic customers.
A good idea.