ChatterBank1 min ago
Inheritance and CGT on a share in a house owned many years
1 Answers
Recently our aunt died, and she lived alone in a house she co-owned with her brother. She willed her half to him. The estimated value of the house at her death was �300,000, and was purchased by them around 56 years ago. He lived in the house for a few years after it was initially purchased.
What are the Capital Gains implications for him, if he chooses to sell the house. (He has a separate home of his own)
What are the Capital Gains implications for him, if he chooses to sell the house. (He has a separate home of his own)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by witz3nd. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.So far as his sister's share is concerned, there are no CGT implications unless her half of the sale price is in excess of the value of her half at the date of her death (which is the value used for any IHT calculation).
If the sale price (after allowing for sale costs such as legal and agents fees) is higher then he will almost certainly have to pay CGT on the difference between the two values unless is is under his annual CGT allowance (currently �9200, I believe). It is possible there might be some reduction because he lived in the house for some time, but I doubt it because it is his sister's share not his own.
So far as his own share is concerned, I believe his CGT liability will be based on the value of his share in 1982, updated for inflation and taper relief. There will almost certainly be some allowance for the fact that he occupied the house for part of the time. This area is complex and he will need to get professional advice.
The Government is proposing to change the CGT rules and the effect may then be quite different.
If the sale price (after allowing for sale costs such as legal and agents fees) is higher then he will almost certainly have to pay CGT on the difference between the two values unless is is under his annual CGT allowance (currently �9200, I believe). It is possible there might be some reduction because he lived in the house for some time, but I doubt it because it is his sister's share not his own.
So far as his own share is concerned, I believe his CGT liability will be based on the value of his share in 1982, updated for inflation and taper relief. There will almost certainly be some allowance for the fact that he occupied the house for part of the time. This area is complex and he will need to get professional advice.
The Government is proposing to change the CGT rules and the effect may then be quite different.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.