Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Termination of Tenancy
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by tabbitha. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hey tabbitha,
I presume your contract doesn't cover this? You seem to have read that document well, so I shall assume that this exact scenario is not covered.
Others, especially lillabet, are very helpful on these matters. My thoughts are that under the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel she cannot claim rent for any longer until 20th June 205 - then end of the notice period.
http://england.shelter.org.uk/advice/advice-271.cfm This is the most comprehensive advice I could find, but it didn't really answer the question. It did point out that it depends on whether your agreement is fixed term or rolling, and that if it's fixed term, there may still be a clause to say it can be terminated.
However, I think if you call them, or the Citizens' Advice Bureau they will be able to answer you very quickly.
Good luck!!! :-)
I assume your tenancy started on 16 January, and the notice that you recieved expires on 15 July. If that is so then all your landlady has done is to act in accordance with the tenancy. If your landlady has given notice which does not conform to the above then it is of no effect, and the tenancy continues to run. In either case you have to abide by your part of the bargain, and pay rent until the tenancy comes to a end. There appears to be no question of the landlady reletting, and mitigating any loss, because of the proposed sale.
Didwot - I don't think tabbitha disputes that she was given 2 months notice and has to move out. I think her query is relating to the extra month's rent that she's being asked for. She's be asked to move out within 2 months, but to pay rent for 3 months after the date notice was served. At least that's how I understand the problem.
I personally think that if notice was served on April 20th, then tabbitha not only HAS to be out by that date, but on that date, the legal relationship comes to an end and no rent should be due for time AFTER the 2 months' notice.
Hi, hope I can help - but I don't think this is going to be what you want to hear. Assuming that you have a standard shorthold assured tenancy agreement with no special notice clauses then the position is as follows.
1 You have committed to pay for six months rent.
2 You are entitled to remain in the property for the full six months unless the landlord wants to repossess her house during the term which she can only do so with a Court Order which is only granted on defined grounds. The grounds include arrears of rent over two months, failing to comply with tenancy conditions and nuisance.
3 If your landlady does not want the tenancy to continue at the end of the assured period then she has to give at least 2 months notice. So if she wants you out at the end of the six months ahe has to give you notice at the latest by the end of month 4.
4 By giving notice three months early she has not broken her part of the agreement she has actually exceeded the minimum that she is required to do. What she has done is give you notice for the end of the agreement not notice for two months from the date that she spoke/wrote to you.
5 If you have not done anything that would allow her to remove you via Court Order you can stay in your current house until the tenancy agreement expires on 28th July 2005.
6 However. If you and your landlady reach mutual agreement to vary the terms of the agreement then such an agreement is binding. So if you convince her that vacant possession is in her interests when selling the house then she may agree to your not paying the final month's rent.
Otherwise you do have to pay.
Perhaps tabbitha could help by copnfirming the start date of the tenancy, and the date for recovery of possession given in the notice.
Thanks! I shall probably have my most dull weekend in Manchester for a long time - it's revision time. You'll be pleased to know I finished with Land Law a long time ago and it fell out of my head pretty quickly after that! I have exams in Economic Analysis of Corporate Governance, and Ec Analysis of Regulation next week. Oh - and Basic Qunatitative Methods. Mmmmmm - FUN!
PS - Sorry tabbitha - not meaning to hijack!
Right - I've reread this and I'm still totally confused. The information on the Shelter website (I gave a link above) says that a landlord must give 2 months notice. It doesn't say that they CAN'T give notice within the 6 months. I'm not meaning to say that you guys are wrong, but it appears to me that either you guys are wrong, or the website is. Gawd I'm glad I'm going into Pensions law! Teehee!
I don't think the shelter site is particularly well worded. As I understand it the tenancy is assured for a set period of time. If the landlord wishes to give you notice that they wish you to leave at the end of the assured period then they must give you at least 2 months notice.
So if they want to let to you for 6 months and only 6 months then they could give you notice at any point from the first day of the tenancy up to the last day of month 4. In all cases this just means that the tenancy will not be renewed.
In tabbitha's case her landlady has given notice at the end of month 3. So in effect she has given 3 months notice.