Who Told Vorderman People Care What She...
News0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by andyjevs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you have a car on Motability, it MUST be used for the person who is entitled to the DLA. Although you are 'giving up' your DLA allowance, the car costs much much more than this to run, service, insure than this.
It is a term of the Contract Hire agreement that the vehicle must be used the majority of the time for the person who is eligible for the allowance.
I sell motability cars, it annoys me when we get people in who use motability cars for their work and not for the DLA claimant.
I have in the past reported serious offenders to Motability and they have on occasion had the cars taken of them.
This, in my opinion is as bad as direct benefit fraud as it is still costing the state money.
I seem to have come rather late to this post and although you already have an overwhelming verdict of other people to shop him, I can only add my own agreement. Benefit fraud is an enormous problem in this country and those of us who work hard, and go without to save for our own future so we can be independent of the state are supporting these fraudsters, for that is exactly what they are. They are also making it more difficult for those genuinely on benefits because of ill-health or disability to get a fair hearing because of the overwhelming demands on the benefit budget. If you haven't done so already I suggest you report him anonymously. I would also ask yourself very seriously if you really want to count this person as a real friend. He has obviously become an embarrassment to you and if you can find a way of gradually cooling the relationship it may be a relief to you in the long term, especially if he gets prosecuted, otherwise a lot of people may start wondering whether you share his values and are acting in a similarly dishonest manner.
It may help Oneeyedvic if you actually bothered to read the posts before responding (perhaps your name gives the best clue as to why you don't) I wasn't suggesting that those people paying cash were commiting fraud, meerly giving the tradesperson the ability so to do. If everyone payed by cheque or credit card the transactions are traceable and therefore there is less oportunity for declaring less than the invoiced total. You will remember that the original poster maintained that this person only ever declared a percentage of cash transactions. There are also charges for paying cash in to a business bank account, just to correct another of your inaccuracies. There aren't of course any charges for just sticking it in your back pocket
I pay tradesman cash to get a discount, I also on occasions speed in my car. We all do! I certainly do not condone fraud or tax evaision but rather than throwing up my hands in horror and rightious indignation, I'm prepared to accept that my actions, in some small way, only serve to perpetuate the problem. I was simply suggesting that other posters do the same.
be very careful here, i have read about people doing this and then being terrorised by the person they shopped. in one case the dole told him who'd shopped him!
i would send him an anonymous letter, either just a handwritten note saying you will shop him unless he stops, or a fake headed official looking letter - saying ther have been discrepancies on his account and his action will be being monitored closely over the next 12 months to uncover any fraud etc or whatever
i know its unlikely but he may fall for it and stop. that way at least he gets no more money.
but shopping him, you run the risk of him going to prison, losing his house or whatever etc so it depends on whether you want your mate to go through all that or just stop him.
incidentally, - does any one think that if benefit fraud was stamped out the government would lower the taxes? no, me neither. you will have to pay it anyway regardless of what it goes to pay for.
joko Fraud sections would NEVER disclose the identity of an informant and they will never tell an informant the progress of an investigation. If someone ends up in prison or loses their house because of fraud then so be it. Folk seem to think Benefit fraud is ok and turn a blind eye to it but it amounts to �2,000,000,000 each year or �80 being taken from every family in the UK. If you suspect fraud, REPORT IT.
If you are going to commit a crime, and this is what it is, then you have to keep it to yourself. If this friend is stupid and arrogant enough to boast about it then he deserves to be caught. He obviously does not need the taxpayers money so why should he continue to steal it?
If you saw him robbing a bank or mugging old ladies would you still do nothing? The sad thing is that by boasting to you, he sees you as being as dishonest as him and by not reporting him you really are an accomplice! You could be in trouble for withholding information.
corbyloon - well perhaps it was accidental but that is what happened. the articles were all in a magazine, (take a break or chat or something. can't recall which one)
perhaps they overheard a conversation, glanced at a form, 'knows someone', or whatever, i don't know, the articles were told from the victims point of view, but there is a risk or they wouldn't have had a huge article with about 5-6 families telling their stories of victimisation stemming from shopping someone.
I don't think its okay, i merely said be careful and consider the consequences.
i agree this guy doesn't sound like he'd be a great loss as a friend.
also some poeple don't need to be told, they will either guess or assume, rightly or wrongly.
Oneyedvic being self employed yourself you'll know that any income should be declared as such. The fact that you might use the cash to pay another bill is irrelevant. if you take �100 from someone for doing a job, then you declare a �100 as income. If you use �80 of that cash to pay another bill you don't declare the remaining �20 as income you sill declare �100 and have your accountant offset your bill payments against tax.
The original poster maintained that her friend was not declaring the whole sum as income but only a part. If he, you, or any other self employed person was paid by cheque or credit card these transactions would be traceable and therefore less inclined to abuse. The same applies for payments. As a self employed person you must see the advantage in using a credit or debit card or even a cheque to make payments. They too are easier to trace and when you come to fill in your annual return your accountant has a far easier (and therfore less costly) job of preparing your return for the revenue.
That said, we are however in agreement on the original point made by the poster. This will be the 38th post to this question that must be some kind of record!
Both he and his mother are stealing benefit which they are not entitled to.
His mother is not entitled to mobility allowance if she can use the bus, unless the bus stop is in front of her house etc. This benefit is only payable if you have difficulty in walking due to ill health, ie due to a disablement or due to pain when walking which stops you walking, the car should only be used for helping the disabled person not as someone elses runaround.
Entitlement to these benefits could also make someone else entitlted to Carers allowance, your friend or someone else may also claim this though clearly the mother does not need a carer. Report this on 0845 712 3456 [DLA office number] or fraud line 0800 8544 40 its your tax money funding his live style.