Crosswords1 min ago
what is the difference between bankruptcy and going into liquidation?
9 Answers
what is the difference between bankruptcy and going into liquidation. my friends hubby had a franchise that made a loss, he took out a personal loan on the premises, a house he owned and turned into a shop downstairs. bailiffs are coming round to his other house he lives in with threats at the moment.i just dont get it, why his debts arent wiped out if he has gone bankrupt??
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bubbles4920. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Bankruptcy doesn't make debt disappear. If he has assets they will have to be sold to meet his debts.
Bankruptcy is an option if your debts are greater than your assets - there will still be debt after the assets are realised, and this amount will be significantly reduced.
If a person lives in rented accommodation, owns nothing of value and has no savings but massive debts - then the debt is more or less wiped out on bankruptcy.
If it were any other way, everyone would go on a six month world cruise, buy a racy car and live the high life on credit - then declare themselves bankrupt and keep their assets.
Bankruptcy is an option if your debts are greater than your assets - there will still be debt after the assets are realised, and this amount will be significantly reduced.
If a person lives in rented accommodation, owns nothing of value and has no savings but massive debts - then the debt is more or less wiped out on bankruptcy.
If it were any other way, everyone would go on a six month world cruise, buy a racy car and live the high life on credit - then declare themselves bankrupt and keep their assets.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
From what you have written it seems that he has personal debts and business debts. If he has gone bankrupt as an individual then he cannot any longer be chased by creditors (or bailiffs) for his personal debts. Also, if the business was not a limited company he would have been personally responsible for the business debts and they should have been included in his bankruptcy.
Your reference to liquidation makes it seem that the business was a limited company. If he has put that into liquidation then dealing with the business debt creditors becomes a matter for the liquidators and he should not be pursued by bailiffs for those debts.
Your reference to liquidation makes it seem that the business was a limited company. If he has put that into liquidation then dealing with the business debt creditors becomes a matter for the liquidators and he should not be pursued by bailiffs for those debts.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.