BlackadderV: oh heck! I don't think the difference between the two really matters which regards to this 'qualification'. As long as the syllabus covers all that is required in a food hygiene course and is completed then I personally don't think it matters who has 'accredited' it or not. Then again, who decides who are the 'accredited' companies? the FSA?
I wouldn't of really been able to comment had I not been involved in volunteering last year but now I have, I think I can safely say the following.
Some people, in this case we are referring to the homeless, do care who has prepared and cooked their meals for them - some do not. It all boils (no pun intended) down, in my opinion, to how grateful these people are. Some of these people are forced (not physically) to scavenge through bins for left overs and drink rain water that has collected in crisp bags and styrofoam food containers.
This has been mentioned by someone else on this thread - apologies for not remember who; it really doesn't matter if you have a certificate, accredited or otherwise, or not if you're not actually going to follow the rules. I was the only person in the food kitchen who has an in date level 3 food hygiene certificate. 4 out of 5 people in the kitchen followed a basic level of hygiene and even knew that certain food was to be prepared in specific areas and on coloured chopping boards. I was very impressed - not that impressed though as 9/10 of know the basic food safety/hygiene rules.