I think she was Sarah Ann Brown and ancestry have mistranscribed the reference, as Sarah Ann Brown married in Q4 1869 newark ref 7b 593 and henry hoban married Q4 1869 newark ref 7b 594, but, on the ancestry index there is only one male on henry's page but 2 females and 1 male on the page sarah is on, so , looking at the original image of the index,.....yes, ancestry have mis-transcribed the page number as on the original image it is 593, and so sarah ann was sarah ann brown, hunch worked!