ChatterBank5 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fairfax. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you mean the life-size prone statues (rather than actual carvings into the lid) they've mostly lost their noses because noses are notoriously easy to knock off. They've often lost fingers as well. Remember if they're four or five hundred years old, as many of them are, they've been through some pretty troubled times over the years and that, plus general wear and tear, will damage the most vulnerable bits first.
You are probably thinking of the Eyptian method of desecrating a tomb. The nose was often hacked away, or the face mutilated and the name removed from stone carvings so that the dead person wouldn�t be recognised in the afterlife.
I am not certain that the same applies for the tombs you refer, but there may be much merit in both answers above. Cut the nose off to spite the face etc.
I am not certain that the same applies for the tombs you refer, but there may be much merit in both answers above. Cut the nose off to spite the face etc.
Oliver Cromwell's soldiers were notorious for desecrating everything that they could in churches in the mid seventeeth century. Statues and carvings were particularly prone to smashing and disfigurement in the interests of discouraging idolatry.
A few cases may be explained by the old Bernard Miles monologue, when he said that it weren't the roundheads - "that old crusader were the finest bit of sharpening stone in Hertfordshire."
A few cases may be explained by the old Bernard Miles monologue, when he said that it weren't the roundheads - "that old crusader were the finest bit of sharpening stone in Hertfordshire."
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.