And Even More Good News From Labour.
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Geenarex. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.WaldoMcFroog, I have mever been there and I made this up myself. I have never heard of this being said before.
For the angels you were talking about, they were meant to have wings right, but what if they were just said to have had wings so that people could understand how they floated. They are not going to believe that you can just levitate on the spot. I didn't believe in the bible until I thought of this. To me it sounds like they are just always looking out for us and they created a religion a long time ago so that nothing bad would go wrong if they believed in it.
question: if YOU had the ability to travel through space at a very high speed, chanced across an in habited planet with conditions that are suitable for you to land on it, for SOME reason picked out the humans as the most intelligent being, just happened to be humanoid in appearance, had a magical healing machine, WHY would you choose this jesus bloke to heal? firstly why would you bother magically healing anyone, and secondly why him in particular? and, seeing that humans are evidently of inferior intelligence to your own advanced race, would you not then colonise the planet?
and the bible, really - don't even go there. it was written a thousand or so years ago, has been edited by a large number of different people & cultures, and is incredibly biased toward some male god when in fact round about when jesus would've been alive (IF he even existed, which i doubt) women were a main focus, all this goddess worship, and it's only with the advent of the church that the idea of female omnipotent beings was discarded
Geenarex:
You stated that you 'didn't believe in the bible until I thought of this.'
So, you think that the presence of extra-terrestrials makes the bible story more plausible. it does actually, but only slightly, which isn't enough to make it anywhere near plausible!
For the record I do think that the existence of aliens is more likely than the existence of a god / gods.
Thousands of years ago, our ancestors witnessed a great many events which, at the time they couldn't explain (eg. lightning, volcanic eruptions, storms etc.) and with their limited knowledge created explanations (an outside force controlling the elements - let's call them gods).
Now, with our slightly more advanced knowledge of the world & solar system (but no-less colourful imaginations) we have explained most of the things that our ancestors couldn't, but we still create other theories for unexplained events and jump to other conclusions.
My advice is be a sceptic - it's good for you!
TO : Alphil_72. . . . alphil, i don't give credence to those who hold the belief that young children should be slaughtered and eaten. does this mean i don't have a place on this planet?
i don't think inflammatory generalisations are likely to help the forum in any way. apologies for my frankness, but this kind of thing winds me up a little eventually. fond regards to all.
I must confess that it would take more "faith" for me to believe the alien theory than to believe in God and to accept the Bible as true. Theories that do not have definitive proof must all be accepted by what I think the Bible refers to as "faith." I agree with APhil, everyone has a right to believe as they believe. Those who try to cram religion down other people's throats can find another planet. Not even Jesus did that from the stories I've read about him in the Bible.
But IF the Bible is true, then where would that leave all of us as human beings? We would be no worse off for believing it, but in terrible shape if we reject it. And if the Bible is not true, then we would be no worse off for believing it or for rejecting it either way. Better safe than sorry? This is personal opinion, of course. I have to decide what I am going to believe for myself. Aliens or God? Just something to think about.
indeed, chiron. ain't it great to be able to use an unreferenced quote to kill a topic by second-hand put down. negates the need to come up with an opinion of one's own, n'est pas?
now then, wasn't it Winston Churchill who said "it's a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations...?"
meta
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.