Body & Soul5 mins ago
The Leadership of Hannibal (of Carthage)
6 Answers
The leadership of HANNIBAL (of carthage)
Would anyone have a few bullet points for the following questions?
What type of leader was he?
What influenced his leadership style?
Good examples of his leadership?
What one has learnt from his leadership style?
Many thanks for all your help!
Would anyone have a few bullet points for the following questions?
What type of leader was he?
What influenced his leadership style?
Good examples of his leadership?
What one has learnt from his leadership style?
Many thanks for all your help!
Answers
1 to 6 of 6
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Answers123. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
like a good military leader, he led from the front; and he had the courage and hardihood to do the unexpected, which was lead elephants across the Alps, invade Rome from the north, and give them a severe fright before they finally got their act together.
As for what influenced his style, ah, you may have to look that one up for yourself.
As for what influenced his style, ah, you may have to look that one up for yourself.
We just lurv the US high school history syllabus.
Look, anything we think we know about Hannibal is a secondary or third-hand source that was written with an agenda.
In earlier writings he was portrayed as evil and untrustworthy, and in later writings he is a 'noble savage'. This simply reflects changes in Roman intellectual fashion.
Any evidence about him as a person was destroyed along with his language, culture and homeland. The Romans did this to destroy Carthage as a rival economic force in the mediterranean.
The only certainty is that to have organised the near-successful campaign against Rome using a difficult land route, he must have been a terrific military leader.
Look, anything we think we know about Hannibal is a secondary or third-hand source that was written with an agenda.
In earlier writings he was portrayed as evil and untrustworthy, and in later writings he is a 'noble savage'. This simply reflects changes in Roman intellectual fashion.
Any evidence about him as a person was destroyed along with his language, culture and homeland. The Romans did this to destroy Carthage as a rival economic force in the mediterranean.
The only certainty is that to have organised the near-successful campaign against Rome using a difficult land route, he must have been a terrific military leader.
1 to 6 of 6
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.