I have a conventional oil boiler. It must be 30 years old. I am constantly told by local heating engineers that, because of Building Regulations, any conventional boiler must be replaced with a convection boiler, which, naturally means several thousand pounds (according to them) in work over and beyond the cost of the boiler. I am being quoted widely different quotes but all in the several thousands even though all agree that the pipes and radiators (the radiators are new) do not need replacing. It's just the boiler and attendant 'essentials' plus labour that costs.
Now, I have looked at Building Regs. Where exactly does it say that conventional boilers must be replaced with the other type? And is it illegal to get the old one serviced, repaired and working again (presumably not!)?
Any 'notified' or 'agreed' building work incorporating a new system will require an energy efficient boiler ie Condensing.
Replacement or upgrading system ... Fit what you like!
I just replaced an old Boulter (1996 ish) with a later Boulter (2006 ish) for a customer. Much better boiler .. quieter and more efficient.
Any 'notified' or 'agreed' building work incorporating a new system will require an energy efficient boiler ie Condensing.
Replacement or upgrading system ... Fit what you like!
I just replaced an old Boulter (1996 ish) with a later Boulter (2006 ish) for a customer. Much better boiler .. quieter and more efficient.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.