Crosswords5 mins ago
Dismissal within first few months
41 Answers
If I want to get rid of a member of staff that only started 2 months ago because they are not good at their job and they keep making serious errors, how easy is it to do?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dotty.. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Surely it depends on the Terms of their Contract? -it should be set out in this what is expected of them and what will happen if they are 'made redundant' or sacked. Usually you have to give them at least one Verbal and Written warning. Are they are trainees? Are you expecting more from them than their experience or training? Have they an attitude problem? Its easy enough to do if you follow the rules and don't give them grounds for unfair dismisssal.
Sorry but whilst it may be goof practice to go through a process of warnings there is no need in law for new employees- you can dismiss within the first 13 months for almost any reason (exceptions being because of trade union membership, race or gender. You just need to give the contractual notice and allow for holidays due
If they keep making errors, have they received sufficient training? Have they signed to say they have received sufficient training in order to do their job? Personally, I would retrain the colleague, and explain clearly that further errors will lead to disciplinary action which could result in them losing their job. I would document the conversation for their file a back up, including a signature from the worker that they have received retraining
He wasn't sacked though dotty. And he was entitled to six month's pay under his contract- and they need him to take part in some enquiries. It was a negotiated arrangement that is in both parties' interests. Sacking him would have caused questions to be asked about who should be sacked for recruiting him and an admission of failure in the ability of someone to supervise him adequately.
Still, it seems he did pretty well out of it to me
Still, it seems he did pretty well out of it to me
dotty - if the high street workers Contract contained a clause that they would receive a proportion of their annual salary if they resigned or got sacked then the rule would apply. It was in his contract that he would get half a years Salary if he resigned or got sacked -the BBC decided to double that - The BBC have every right to dictate what give whatever perks they want to give to their employees just as the high street shop owner has.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.