Donate SIGN UP

Pros And Cons Of Buying A 1930S House

Avatar Image
postman44 | 18:12 Wed 19th Feb 2020 | Home & Garden
15 Answers
Would you buy a 1930s home or a modern home.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by postman44. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Depends on your preference. My house was built around 1935, and I love it. I'm not a fan of modern.
1930s.
Con= pointing!
I would, especially if it isnt flooded in this weather. Make sure it is insurable & not like some of flooded homes in news today, that are not insured & expect gov to pay up.
Older houses all the way...don't want too be listening to the neighbours antics so prefer a solid building...
Cons,1930's...usually very small kitchens.
New houses tend to have thin walls.
I live in a Victorian house. The rooms are massive with solid walls.
which one's on a floodplain?
Old any day. New builds are too small, too close, and badly constructed.
We had a 1935 house, loved it, moved to a bigger one built in the 70s with some stud walls, but still nice and solid.
clue: Advance spin off monster
advance = (pr)ogress
- pr (spin)

sorry, wrong thread
Old houses tend to have larger rooms with higher ceilings and they often have somewhat attractive architectural features. Buildings from before WW1 are built using hideous amounts of material in the outer walls, something often described as "well built".

We live in a Victorian building which, yes, has all the above features and moreover has a generous garden. However, I would dispute the well built notion because when we bought it the windows and roof were horrendously draughty, there was no insulation anywhere and no heating either (I don't count open fireplaces in every room where any heat was sucked out to the outdoors through the chimneys). We have changed all the windows (thermally preferenced wide double glazing), re-slated with membrane, insulated thoroughly overhead, insulated outer walls so far as practicable, installed solar space and water heating plus biomass heating.....and the place is now inhabitable and in fact not bad, it has taken a lot of time, effort and expense. I would not want to start again on the same elsewhere nor would I like to live in an old house with all the disadvantages they normally come with, particularly the hopeless thermal leaks (I will not accept freezing in my own home).

Genuinely well built modern houses with spacious feel are available, especially detached ones but, although the latest houses are well insulated, there is far too much corner cutting and poor supervision. The common perception that new houses are shoddily built is too often fully justified/deserved.

To sum up, either way, unless you are prepared to put right the unacceptable aspects, you are likely to be to some extent dissatisfied with either option.
*wide gap double glazing. We removed/blocked off al the fireplaces and removed the chimneys - cultural vandalism some feel but we also did not reconstruct the Victorian gas lighting or toilet facilities originally in the house.
You did mean "habitable" in your description,Karl,hopefully.
Yep, habitable.....thanks.

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Pros And Cons Of Buying A 1930S House

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.