News0 min ago
Water Meter
33 Answers
Would it worthwhile to switch to a water meter? I have just received my annual invoice for £386.49 comprising:
Total water charge: £176.37
Total used water charge: £210.12
If I did have a water meter I'd still have to pay the fixed used water charge, I think.
Total water charge: £176.37
Total used water charge: £210.12
If I did have a water meter I'd still have to pay the fixed used water charge, I think.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by hc4361. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.MoneySavingExpert says...It's important to work out if a meter is financially worthwhile. As a rough rule of thumb, if there are more or the same number of bedrooms in your house than people, check out getting a meter. Sadly in Scotland it's not free to have a water meter installed (it's actually quite pricey) so, unless you live alone in a manor-type-property, you should stick to estimated payments.
>>>If I did have a water meter I'd still have to pay the fixed used water charge, I think
I very much doubt it. As far as I'm aware, all metered water supplies charge for sewerage as a fixed standing charge plus an amount per cubic metre of foul water leaving your house (which is assessed as being 90% of the amount of clean water that went into it). So reducing the amount of clean water going into your house also results in a lower charge for the foul water leaving it. e.g:
http:// www.ang lianwat er.co.u k/house hold/yo ur-acco unt/tar iffs/st andard- rates/
Unless you've got a very big family living at home (or other reasons for high water usage, such as a massive garden) it's likely that switching to a water meter will save you money. Use this calculator to check:
http:// www.ccw ater.or g.uk/wa termete rcalcul ator/
I very much doubt it. As far as I'm aware, all metered water supplies charge for sewerage as a fixed standing charge plus an amount per cubic metre of foul water leaving your house (which is assessed as being 90% of the amount of clean water that went into it). So reducing the amount of clean water going into your house also results in a lower charge for the foul water leaving it. e.g:
http://
Unless you've got a very big family living at home (or other reasons for high water usage, such as a massive garden) it's likely that switching to a water meter will save you money. Use this calculator to check:
http://
I changed to a water meter 2 years ago, so I know about charges.
You are charged per cubic meter (1,000 litres) for the water you use and the water used minus 10% for waste water /sewage.
we are charged £2 a C/M for water and £4 a C/M for waste water / sewage.
So if I use 100C/M the charge is 100 x £2 plus 100 x 0.9 x £4 which equals £560 .
Our waste/ sewage is handled by a different company from the supply
If you are not on mains sewage you do not pay the waste part of the bill but you will have to pay the charge for a septic tank.
You are charged per cubic meter (1,000 litres) for the water you use and the water used minus 10% for waste water /sewage.
we are charged £2 a C/M for water and £4 a C/M for waste water / sewage.
So if I use 100C/M the charge is 100 x £2 plus 100 x 0.9 x £4 which equals £560 .
Our waste/ sewage is handled by a different company from the supply
If you are not on mains sewage you do not pay the waste part of the bill but you will have to pay the charge for a septic tank.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Water meter cost calculator here, just put in your water company and details
http:// www.ccw ater.or g.uk/wa termete rcalcul ator/
http://
It would probably work out cheaper. It is, after all, a bribe to get you to change; which is what they want. Which ultimately is control.
You get into a position where you feel you should avoid using water, even if hygiene suggests you ought. So the companies can eventually supply less, yet raise the charge to ensure they get the same (or as much as they want) profit.
In the meanwhile the morally superior method of a community covering the cost of water that everyone in the community needs, both for their and for their neighbours' sake, is charged at a higher rate than metered, to achieve this manipulation.
Short term benefit for you, in exchange for a longer term less beneficial position for both you and your progeny. Trouble is even if you make a stand the rest will grab the cakes and circuses and you'll be left in the same boat anyway.
You get into a position where you feel you should avoid using water, even if hygiene suggests you ought. So the companies can eventually supply less, yet raise the charge to ensure they get the same (or as much as they want) profit.
In the meanwhile the morally superior method of a community covering the cost of water that everyone in the community needs, both for their and for their neighbours' sake, is charged at a higher rate than metered, to achieve this manipulation.
Short term benefit for you, in exchange for a longer term less beneficial position for both you and your progeny. Trouble is even if you make a stand the rest will grab the cakes and circuses and you'll be left in the same boat anyway.