Trump/Ukraine, What Will He Do?
News6 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by tali122. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I believe that when NI first started it was 'sold' to the population on the basis that the money would fund the new concept called the National Health Service. This has long since ceased to be the case. Its just another form of taxation and the money goes straight into Gordon's coffers, from which the whole of Government spending is funded. Its is bit like the argument that Road Fund duty for vehicles maintains the roads. It doesn't - the collection vastly exceeds the expenditure.
Why is separate? - better ask Gordon. It could be a lot more efficient to treat it as part of income tax and just have one set of civil servants administering the collection of direct taxes. But it would also be different to convince the people and endless arguments would occur about who was better off / worse off.