Now I have tried the problem, it is actually easier than it looks. In case you do not wish to solve it yourself, my derivation is as below. (Please imagine there to be line breaks where I have inserted < BR >. I have drawn some diagrams to help:
http://images.dpchallenge.com/images_portfolio/16982/medium/ 114398.jpg and
http://www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=114399) <BR><BR>
First, imagine a square 8cm by 8cm [diagram 1]. It should be clear how the area of a square or rectangle (base x height) is arrived at, and that the area of this square is 64cm�. <BR><BR>
See how I have divided the square into 8 lines 1cm wide and 8cm long. This is just a simplified representation of how area is calculated, i.e. an infinite number of infinitely thin 8cm lines, all touching, and extending for 8cm. What if these 8 lines (which represent an infinite number) were in a more circular arrangement? Their area would still, obviously, add up to 64cm� [diagram 2]. <BR><BR>
I have shown this by turning each rectangle that makes up the square into a triangle of equal area, then joining the triangles back together. If there were more triangles you can see that the resultant shape would look more circular; if there were <I>infinite</I> triangles the shape <I>would</I> be a circle. <BR><BR>
[Continued]