Reform Gaining Huge Numbers Of Votes...
News3 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by neil palmer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Neil -- The only damage will be to your police record.
Flanker -- You've obviously been lucky so far. The revenue can detect the smallest trace of the red dye in your tank, so fingers crossed...
The cost of fuel is:
We only pay the first three of these. We do not pay the last at all -- yet. Therefore we all use fuel with little hesitation (I'm as guilty as anyone). We run our lives around cheap fuel -- for example we live miles from work, we buy guzzling vehicles, we distribute goods by road and air, etc etc. We are spending the family silver, and loading the cost on our descendents. Fair play on the environment?
If you can think of another way to stop people wasting fuel, then you would be entirely justified in complaining about what is in fact a very small amount of tax (a criminally small amount in countries like the US).
Another point is that tax does not "belong" to the Treasury -- one way or the other eventually it comes back to us, the taxpayers. It's still our money while Gordon has it. For example, it enormously subsidises construction and maintenance of roads -- especially for heavy vehicles, which damage the road surface thousands of times as much as smaller ones.
Flanker,
Just to make things clear: next time we both get run down by a car, need the police, ambulance, emergency open heart surgery, hospital bed, invalidity care for 8 months, protection from catastrophe/invasion by foreign hostiles/terrorists, supply of near-free education, infrastucture, transport, arts and entertainment then I GET ACCESS TO IT BEFORE YOU AND MORE OF IT WHEN I DO, BECAUSE I'M PREPARED TO PAY MY FAIR SHARE FOR IT AND YOU'RE NOT?