Protests Erupt In Syria Over Christmas...
News2 mins ago
Unusual motor insurance clause
2 Answers
What mischief is this restrictive clause , now found in motor insurance policies ,aimed at preventing?
" This policy does not cover use to secure the release of a motor vehicle, other than the vehicle identified above by its registration mark, which has been seized by , or on behalf of, any government or public authority"
" This policy does not cover use to secure the release of a motor vehicle, other than the vehicle identified above by its registration mark, which has been seized by , or on behalf of, any government or public authority"
Answers
1 to 2 of 2
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fredpuli47. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Mr C's car is impounded for no tax.
Not a problem, he thinks. My friend Mr X is allowed to drive 'any other vehicle with the owner's permission' on his insurance -he can say he was driving and it was insured on his policy and I'll get my car back.
Oh no he can't! This clause specifically prevents retrieval of a vehicle other than the one it is insured for.
Not a problem, he thinks. My friend Mr X is allowed to drive 'any other vehicle with the owner's permission' on his insurance -he can say he was driving and it was insured on his policy and I'll get my car back.
Oh no he can't! This clause specifically prevents retrieval of a vehicle other than the one it is insured for.
1 to 2 of 2
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.