Crosswords1 min ago
A question of grammar
When is it correct to say "I were....." and "I was.....". Most of us have probably said "If I were you....." but I wouldn't expect to say "I were going for a walk this morning".
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Coldicote. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think there's some funny rule about use of the conditional tense matching the (otherwise) plural form of the verb with the singular person.
So ...
"I'd" (conditional tense) look it up "if" (conditional provision coming up) I were (plural form, usually used for first person plural, here being used for singular) you.
So ...
"I'd" (conditional tense) look it up "if" (conditional provision coming up) I were (plural form, usually used for first person plural, here being used for singular) you.
I think it's called the second conditional.
A text book gives the example "if I WERE you.." and refers to 'were' being used a sit's an impossible situation.
It then gives another example of the second conditional of "If I WAS the president I'd .." and describes this as an unlikley situation.
Maybe , then, I WERE is used only for impossible situations and I WAS is used for unlikely situations.
It just shows how complicated the English language is.
A text book gives the example "if I WERE you.." and refers to 'were' being used a sit's an impossible situation.
It then gives another example of the second conditional of "If I WAS the president I'd .." and describes this as an unlikley situation.
Maybe , then, I WERE is used only for impossible situations and I WAS is used for unlikely situations.
It just shows how complicated the English language is.
Not sure about that 'If I was the president...'
Usually, when we can say, but I'm not, after the If clause for example If I were rich (but I'm not) we use were instead of was. However, If I wasn't rich (but I am) needs the was. It's only this verb which this can happen to as none of the other verbs have two past verbs. ex. we use had for all persons
Usually, when we can say, but I'm not, after the If clause for example If I were rich (but I'm not) we use were instead of was. However, If I wasn't rich (but I am) needs the was. It's only this verb which this can happen to as none of the other verbs have two past verbs. ex. we use had for all persons