Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
heeeeeeelp!
4 Answers
I have been given sources and asked which one I think it more reliable. I am at a loss.
It is regarding the woman's suffrage movement. The first source of evidence is from M. Fawcett who was an MP and all for the right to vote. The other is a speech from Mrs. Pankhurt who also campaigned for the right to vote. I'm not sure which one is more reliable. I would say they would both be bias as they are both wanting to the same thing.
If anyone could help it would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks.
It is regarding the woman's suffrage movement. The first source of evidence is from M. Fawcett who was an MP and all for the right to vote. The other is a speech from Mrs. Pankhurt who also campaigned for the right to vote. I'm not sure which one is more reliable. I would say they would both be bias as they are both wanting to the same thing.
If anyone could help it would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks.
Answers
1 to 4 of 4
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by faithandlove. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Millie Fawcett was a suffragist ie wanted to achieve votes for women thru means legal and constitutional. Pankhursts (Ma Emily , Christabel and Sylvia) disagreed with this as a family and supported illegal radical actions like burning down churches. they were dubbed 'suffragettes' by the beaverbrook press / daily mail and the name stuck.
1 to 4 of 4
