Estoppel 2

[Tiger786]

Just a quick update
Sat with my solicitor today to prepare my defense he seems to think any money my ex husband spent is taken as both as I was looking at decree absolute
I did not understand this bit
Any property which or an interest in which is devised to the former spouse had died on the date on which the marriage is dissolved unless a contrary intention appeases in the will.

[factor-fiction]

It looks as if Tiger is unable to respond at the moment so maybe it's not worth adding anything to the thread at the moment as Ed may be looking at it and deciding what to do with it

[EDDIE51]

We have no time line , Tiger could have been living in the house for years and the ex in laws have finally issued an eviction order after trying to persuade her to leave unsuccessfully.

[netibiza]

but Tiger is the daughter in law on this thread and the father in law on the other thread ,

[Peter Pedant]

The thread seems to have stunned itself to a halt.
FF - the ed may be trying to decide what to do - er wd that be suspend a few more of us ? His track record so far is not good.

From a legal point of view - you.ve been rumbled my girl ! in legal latin
is culpabilis - prest. literally guilty- ready and was used when the prosecution wished to begin. This was shortened to cul:pret and gives rise to our word
culprit.

I dont know what the Latin for I was right all along.... is

[pauln90]

http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/Divorce-Advice/Legal-Aid/389804-will-she-get-legal-aid.html

This username seems to have spent a long time canvassing opinion from many websites. A google of the username (7861) brings up lots of hits. It's all getting very confusing